Suppr超能文献

基础驱动周期长度对程控心室刺激期间室性心动过速诱发率的影响。

Effect of basic drive cycle length on the yield of ventricular tachycardia during programmed ventricular stimulation.

作者信息

Summitt J, Rosenheck S, Kou W H, Schmaltz S, Kadish A H, Morady F

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor 48109-0022.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1990 Jan 1;65(1):49-52. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(90)90024-u.

Abstract

The yield of sustained, monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) induced by programmed ventricular stimulation was compared, using basic drive trains of 400 ms, 600 ms and sinus rhythm, to identify the most efficient sequence of basic drive trains to use during programmed stimulation. Fifty-five patients with coronary artery disease and inducible sustained monomorphic VT not requiring countershock to terminate underwent 81 electrophysiology tests in which 1 to 3 extrastimuli were introduced during sinus rhythm and after basic drive trains of 600 and 400 ms. In 72 electrophysiology tests, sustained, monomorphic VT was induced at the right ventricular apex. The yield of VT using a drive cycle length of 400 ms was 63 of 72 (88%), compared to 46 of 72 (64%) when the drive cycle length was 600 ms, and 23 of 72 (32%) when the extrastimuli were introduced during sinus rhythm (p less than 0.001 for all pairwise comparisons). In 14 electrophysiology tests in which VT was not induced using a 400 ms basic drive cycle length at the apex, the yield of VT was higher using a 400 ms drive cycle length at a second right ventricular site (12 of 14) than with a 600 ms drive cycle length (3 of 12) or sinus rhythm (4 of 12) at the apex (p less than 0.05). The yield of sustained, monomorphic VT induced by 1 to 3 extrastimuli increases as the basic drive cycle length shortens. Whereas programmed stimulation is conventionally started during sinus rhythm or with a drive cycle length of 600 ms, the present results suggest that starting with a drive cycle length of 400 ms may be more efficient.

摘要

采用400毫秒、600毫秒的基础驱动序列以及窦性心律,比较程序性心室刺激诱发持续性单形性室性心动过速(VT)的成功率,以确定程序性刺激期间最有效的基础驱动序列。55例冠心病且可诱发持续性单形性VT但无需电击终止的患者接受了81次电生理检查,在窦性心律期间以及600毫秒和400毫秒的基础驱动序列后引入1至3个期外刺激。在72次电生理检查中,右心室心尖部诱发了持续性单形性VT。驱动周期长度为400毫秒时,72例中有63例(88%)诱发了VT,相比之下,驱动周期长度为600毫秒时,72例中有46例(64%)诱发了VT,而在窦性心律期间引入期外刺激时,72例中有23例(32%)诱发了VT(所有两两比较的p值均小于0.〇〇1)。在14次电生理检查中,心尖部采用400毫秒基础驱动周期长度未诱发VT,在右心室第二个部位采用400毫秒驱动周期长度时VT的诱发率(14例中的12例)高于心尖部采用600毫秒驱动周期长度(12例中的3例)或窦性心律(12例中的4例)时(p值小于0.05)。随着基础驱动周期长度缩短,1至3个期外刺激诱发的持续性单形性VT的成功率增加。虽然程序性刺激传统上是在窦性心律期间或驱动周期长度为600毫秒时开始,但目前的结果表明,从400毫秒的驱动周期长度开始可能更有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验