Suppr超能文献

程控刺激期间驱动周期长度对室性心律失常诱发的影响:403例患者分析

Influence of drive cycle length during programmed stimulation on induction of ventricular arrhythmias: analysis of 403 patients.

作者信息

Estes N A, Garan H, McGovern B, Ruskin J N

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1986 Jan 1;57(1):108-12. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90961-6.

Abstract

The drive cycle length at which programmed ventricular stimulation is performed is a fundamental variable in all stimulation protocols, but the influence of this variable on the ability to induce ventricular arrhythmias has not been systematically analyzed. This study, which included 403 patients with prior ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation undergoing programmed ventricular stimulation with a uniform protocol that incorporated 3 basic drive cycle lengths from the right ventricular apex, was performed to examine the influence of drive cycle length on the induction of ventricular arrhythmias. The sensitivity of the protocol was 62% for nonsustained VT, 73% for ventricular fibrillation and 89% for sustained VT. Fifty-four percent (217 patients) had an arrhythmia induced with programmed ventricular stimulation during ventricular pacing. No arrhythmia was induced in 96 patients (24%), whereas induction was accomplished during sinus rhythm in 61 patients (15%) and rapid ventricular pacing in 29 patients (7%). With this protocol, the sensitivity for single and double extrastimuli during ventricular pacing increases using decremental drive cycle lengths. Although only 2 patients had induction of a ventricular arrhythmia at a drive cycle length of 700 to 650 ms using a single extrastimulus, 14, 8 and 3 patients had ventricular arrhythmias induced by single extrastimuli at drive cycle lengths of 600 to 550, 500 to 450 and 400 ms, respectively. Of 163 patients with arrhythmias induced with double extrastimuli, only 6 had an arrhythmia induced at drive cycle lengths of 700 to 650 ms.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

进行程序性心室刺激时的驱动周期长度是所有刺激方案中的一个基本变量,但该变量对诱发室性心律失常能力的影响尚未得到系统分析。本研究纳入了403例既往有室性心动过速(VT)或心室颤动的患者,采用统一方案从右心室尖部进行程序性心室刺激,该方案包含3个基本驱动周期长度,旨在研究驱动周期长度对诱发室性心律失常的影响。该方案对非持续性VT的敏感性为62%,对心室颤动为73%,对持续性VT为89%。54%(217例患者)在心室起搏期间通过程序性心室刺激诱发了心律失常。96例患者(24%)未诱发心律失常,而61例患者(15%)在窦性心律期间诱发,29例患者(7%)在快速心室起搏期间诱发。采用该方案,在心室起搏期间使用递减的驱动周期长度时,单和双期外刺激的敏感性增加。虽然在700至650毫秒的驱动周期长度下使用单期外刺激仅2例患者诱发了室性心律失常,但在600至550、500至450和400毫秒的驱动周期长度下,分别有14、8和3例患者通过单期外刺激诱发了室性心律失常。在163例通过双期外刺激诱发心律失常的患者中,只有6例在700至650毫秒的驱动周期长度下诱发了心律失常。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验