Middleton Paul M
NSW Institute of Trauma and Injury Management, Australia.
Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2012 Aug;15(3):170-83. doi: 10.1016/j.aenj.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Aug 3.
Narrative review of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) methodology.
Narrative review of published papers describing methodological aspects of the GCS, from Premedline, Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and Ovid Nursing databases from 1950 to May 2012.
Examination of 18,851 references limited to descriptions of GCS development, pathophysiological correlations, examination techniques, complications or clinician agreement gave a final set of 33, which were summarised in this review.
The GCS was designed for the objective measurement of level of consciousness, assessment of trend, and to facilitate accurate and valid communication between clinicians. Concerns have been raised about the potential for misleading levels of precision engendered by the use of the GCS, and the use of simpler scales suggested. This review discusses the GCS and conditions affecting calculation of domain and summary scores, and recommends a method of implementation and interpretation.
对格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)方法进行叙述性综述。
对1950年至2012年5月期间发表在Premedline、Medline、EMBASE、CINAHL和Ovid护理数据库中描述GCS方法学方面的论文进行叙述性综述。
对18,851篇参考文献进行筛选,仅限于GCS的发展描述、病理生理相关性、检查技术、并发症或临床医生共识,最终选定33篇进行综述总结。
GCS旨在客观测量意识水平、评估趋势,并促进临床医生之间准确有效的沟通。有人担心使用GCS可能会产生误导性的精确水平,并建议使用更简单的量表。本综述讨论了GCS以及影响领域和总分计算的情况,并推荐了一种实施和解释方法。