• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is currently of no proven clinical benefit: a systematic review.计算机辅助全膝关节置换术目前尚无临床获益的确切证据:系统评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jan;471(1):264-76. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2528-8.
2
Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis.单髁和全膝关节置换术中计算机导航与机器人技术的现状:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Nov;24(11):3482-3495. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4305-9. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
3
Kinematic Alignment Does Not Result in Clinically Important Improvements After TKA Compared With Mechanical Alignment: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.与机械对线相比,全膝关节置换术后运动学对线并未带来具有临床意义的改善:一项随机试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 1;483(6):1020-1030. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003356. Epub 2025 Jan 21.
4
Are There Differences in Accuracy or Outcomes Scores Among Navigated, Robotic, Patient-specific Instruments or Standard Cutting Guides in TKA? A Network Meta-analysis.导航、机器人、患者特异性器械与标准截骨导板在 TKA 中准确性或结果评分是否存在差异?一项网络荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Sep;478(9):2105-2116. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001324.
5
No Difference in 10-year Clinical or Radiographic Outcomes Between Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment in TKA: A Randomized Trial.全膝关节置换术中运动学与机械对线在10年临床或影像学结果上无差异:一项随机试验
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):140-149. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003193. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
6
Systematic review of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: new but not improved.全膝关节置换术中定制器械的系统评价:新而未改进。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jan;473(1):151-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3804-6.
7
A Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Computer-Assisted vs Minimally Invasive Conventional Instrumentation for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.微创计算机辅助与微创传统器械用于初次全膝关节置换术的短期疗效比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Feb;31(2):410-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.09.013. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
8
Favourable alignment outcomes with MRI-based patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty.基于 MRI 的个体化膝关节假体在全膝关节置换术中获得良好的对线结果。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Sep;26(9):2659-2668. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4637-0. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
9
Outpatient Revision TKA Does Not Increase Incidence of Repeat Revision or Medical and Surgical Complications Compared With Inpatient Revision TKA.与住院全膝关节置换翻修术相比,门诊全膝关节置换翻修术不会增加再次翻修的发生率或内科及外科并发症的发生率。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 5;483(7):1302-7. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003386.
10
Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty for postoperative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis.活动轴承与固定轴承假体用于骨关节炎和类风湿关节炎患者后交叉韧带保留型全膝关节置换术后功能状态的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 4;2015(2):CD003130. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003130.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
There Is a Difference in Patients' Opinions and Scientific Evidence Regarding Robot Assisted Total Joint Arthroplasty: a Questionnaire.患者对机器人辅助全关节置换术的看法与科学证据存在差异:一项问卷调查
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2025 Aug;92(4):218-225. doi: 10.55095/achot2024/063.
2
What Are the Game Changers in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Narrative Review.全膝关节置换术中的变革因素有哪些?一项叙述性综述。
J Pers Med. 2025 Aug 20;15(8):389. doi: 10.3390/jpm15080389.
3
Appropriate sagittal positioning of femoral components in total knee arthroplasty to prevent fracture and loosening.全膝关节置换术中股骨组件矢状面的合适定位以预防骨折和松动。
Bone Joint Res. 2024 Oct 24;13(10):611-621. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.1310.BJR-2023-0362.R2.
4
Progress in Computer-Assisted Navigation for Total Knee Arthroplasty in Treating Knee Osteoarthritis with Extra-Articular Deformity.计算机辅助导航在治疗伴发关节外畸形膝关节骨关节炎全膝关节置换术中的进展。
Orthop Surg. 2024 Nov;16(11):2608-2619. doi: 10.1111/os.14216. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
5
No Difference in Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship for Robotic, Navigational, and Conventional Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty with a Minimum Follow-up of 10 Years.机器人辅助、导航和常规初次全膝关节置换术在 10 年以上的临床结果和生存率方面无差异。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2023 Feb;15(1):82-91. doi: 10.4055/cios21138. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
6
Time is Money! Influence on Operating Theater and Sterilization Times of Patient-specific Cutting Guides and Single-use Instrumentation for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Full Factorial Design of 136 Patients.时间就是金钱!患者特异性截骨导板和一次性器械对全膝关节置换术手术室时间和消毒时间的影响:136例患者的全因子设计
Arthroplast Today. 2022 Oct 22;18:95-102. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.09.004. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
[Future implications of navigation in total knee arthroplasty].[导航技术在全膝关节置换术中的未来应用]
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2022 Sep;51(9):708-718. doi: 10.1007/s00132-022-04285-y. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
8
An umbrella review comparing computer-assisted and conventional total joint arthroplasty: quality assessment and summary of evidence.一项比较计算机辅助与传统全关节置换术的伞状综述:质量评估与证据总结。
BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2020 Jan 28;2(1):e000016. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2019-000016. eCollection 2020.
9
No difference in long-term functional outcomes or survivorship after total knee arthroplasty with or without computer navigation: a 17-year survivorship analysis.全膝关节置换术中使用或不使用计算机导航的长期功能结果或生存率无差异:一项17年的生存率分析。
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2021 Sep 8;33(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s43019-021-00114-2.
10
Efficacy Analysis of Selection of Distal Reference Point for Tibial Coronal Plane Osteotomy during Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Literature Review.全膝关节置换术中胫骨冠状面截骨远端参考点选择的疗效分析:文献回顾。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Jul;13(5):1682-1693. doi: 10.1111/os.13054. Epub 2021 Jun 17.

本文引用的文献

1
A prospective study comparing the functional outcome of computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement.一项比较计算机辅助全膝关节置换与传统全膝关节置换功能结果的前瞻性研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Feb;94(2):194-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B2.27454.
2
Computer navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty: five-year functional results of a prospective randomized trial.计算机导航与传统全膝关节置换术的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验的 5 年功能结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2012 May;27(5):667-72.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Sep 29.
3
Computer-assisted techniques versus conventional guides for component alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.计算机辅助技术与传统引导方法在全膝关节置换中对部件对线的比较:一项随机对照试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Aug 3;93(15):1377-84. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01321.
4
Joint line position correlates with function after primary total knee replacement: a randomised controlled trial comparing conventional and computer-assisted surgery.初次全膝关节置换术后关节线位置与功能相关:一项比较传统手术与计算机辅助手术的随机对照试验
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Sep;93(9):1223-31. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B9.26950.
5
Can computer assistance improve the clinical and functional scores in total knee arthroplasty?计算机辅助能否改善全膝关节置换术的临床和功能评分?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Dec;469(12):3436-42. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2044-2. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
6
Analysis of procedure-related costs and proposed benefits of using patient-specific approach in total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术中与手术相关成本的分析以及采用个性化方法的潜在益处
J Surg Orthop Adv. 2011 Summer;20(2):112-6.
7
Comparison between computer-assisted-navigation and conventional total knee arthroplasties in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral procedures: a randomized clinical trial.计算机辅助导航与常规全膝关节置换术在同期双侧手术患者中的比较:一项随机临床试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Jul 6;93(13):1190-6. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.I.01778.
8
Comparison of radiographic alignment of imageless computer-assisted surgery vs conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty.无图像计算机辅助手术与传统器械在初次全膝关节置换术中的放射学对线比较。
J Arthroplasty. 2011 Dec;26(8):1273-1284.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.04.037. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
9
The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus.奇特朗詹·拉纳瓦特奖:所有患者的中立机械对线都正常吗?解剖性内翻的概念。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Jan;470(1):45-53. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-1936-5.
10
Randomized trial of computer-assisted knee arthroplasty: impact on clinical and radiographic outcomes.计算机辅助膝关节置换术的随机试验:对临床和影像学结果的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2011 Dec;26(8):1259-64. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2011.02.012. Epub 2011 May 17.

计算机辅助全膝关节置换术目前尚无临床获益的确切证据:系统评价。

Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty is currently of no proven clinical benefit: a systematic review.

机构信息

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Victoria/University of British Columbia, Vancouver Island Health, Royal Jubilee Hospital, Suite 305-1120, Yates St., Victoria, BC, Canada V8V-3M9.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jan;471(1):264-76. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2528-8.

DOI:10.1007/s11999-012-2528-8
PMID:22948522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3528921/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Navigated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may improve coronal alignment outliers; however, it is unclear whether navigated TKA improves the long-term clinical results of TKA.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Does the literature contain evidence of better long-term function and lower revision rates with navigated TKA compared with conventional TKA?

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted of navigated TKA reviewing articles related to coronal alignment, clinical knee and function scores, cost, patient satisfaction, component rotation, anteroposterior and mediolateral stability, complications, and longer-term reports.

RESULTS

Coronal plane alignment is improved with navigated TKA with fewer radiographic outliers. We found limited evidence of improvements in any other variable, and function was not improved. The duration of surgery is increased and there are unique complications related to navigated TKA. The long-term benefits of additional increase in accuracy of alignment are not supported by any current evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings in reports of navigated TKA should be interpreted with caution. There are few short- and medium- and no long-term studies demonstrating improved clinical outcomes using navigated TKA. Despite substantial research, contradictory findings coupled with reservations about the cost and efficacy of the technology have contributed to the failure of computer navigation to become the accepted standard in TKA. Longer-term studies demonstrating improved function, lower revision rates, and acceptable costs are required before navigated TKA may be widely adopted. In the future, with improvements in study design, methodology, imaging, navigation technology, newer functional outcome tools, and longer-term followup studies, we suspect that navigated TKA may demonstrate yet unrecognized benefits.

摘要

背景

导航全膝关节置换术(TKA)可能改善冠状面对线不良;然而,尚不清楚导航 TKA 是否能改善 TKA 的长期临床结果。

问题/目的:与传统 TKA 相比,导航 TKA 是否具有更好的长期功能和更低的翻修率的证据?

方法

对导航 TKA 的文献进行了系统综述,综述了与冠状面对线、临床膝关节和功能评分、成本、患者满意度、组件旋转、前后和内外稳定性、并发症以及更长期报告相关的文章。

结果

导航 TKA 可改善冠状面对线,减少影像学对线不良。我们发现,除了对线准确性提高之外,其他任何变量都没有改善的证据,且功能没有得到改善。手术时间延长,且存在与导航 TKA 相关的独特并发症。目前没有任何证据支持增加对线准确性的额外长期获益。

结论

应谨慎解释导航 TKA 报告中的发现。很少有短期、中期和长期研究表明使用导航 TKA 能改善临床结果。尽管进行了大量研究,但与该技术的成本和有效性相关的相互矛盾的发现以及保留意见导致计算机导航未能成为 TKA 的公认标准。在导航 TKA 可能被广泛采用之前,需要进行更长时间的研究,以证明其具有改善的功能、更低的翻修率和可接受的成本。在未来,随着研究设计、方法学、影像学、导航技术、新的功能评估工具和更长期的随访研究的改进,我们怀疑导航 TKA 可能显示出尚未被认识到的益处。