Crossmodal Research Laboratory, Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3UD, UK.
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Nov;223(1):109-20. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3245-y. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
We investigated tactile perception during the execution of self- versus externally-generated movements. In a first experiment, we established the temporal characteristics of the movements of interest. In a second experiment, participants had to try to detect a short gap in an otherwise continuous vibratory stimulus delivered to their right wrist under conditions of rest, throwing (i.e., self-initiated movement), or catching a basketball (i.e., externally-generated movement). Our hypothesis was that different patterns of tactile sensitivity (d') and response bias (criteria c and c') would be observed as a function of the timing of gap delivery (i.e., during movement preparation or movement execution) and the type of movement (self- or externally-generated). A third experiment investigated tactile perception at rest while participants adopted different hand postures. This experiment also tested the simple preparation of the self-/externally-generated movements versus the observation of these targeted movements as performed by the experimenter. Due to sensory suppression, participants were significantly less sensitive in detecting the gap in tactile stimulation while executing the movement. Preparing to catch the ball only triggered a shift in response bias (i.e., participants were more liberal/conservative when reporting the gap in stimulation), but no change in perceptual sensitivity was observed, as compared to rest. Preparing to make a ball-throwing movement resulted in a significant decrement in tactile sensitivity, as well as a shift in participants' criterion toward their being more conservative, when responding to the presence of the target. Similar decrements were observed for the observation of self-initiated movement preparation, but not for the observation of their externally-generated counterparts. Taken together, these results demonstrate that different forms of attenuation influence tactile perception, depending on the type of movement that is executed: perceptual and decisional attenuation for self-initiated movements, but only decisional attenuation for externally-generated movements. These results suggest that the movement preparation sensorimotor contingencies are already modulated in prefrontal decision-related cortical brain areas.
我们研究了在执行自我生成和外部生成运动时的触觉感知。在第一个实验中,我们确定了感兴趣运动的时间特征。在第二个实验中,参与者必须尝试在休息、投掷(即自我发起的运动)或接住篮球(即外部生成的运动)的情况下,检测到施加在他们右腕的连续振动刺激中的短暂间隙。我们的假设是,随着间隙传递的时间(即在运动准备或运动执行期间)和运动类型(自我生成或外部生成)的不同,会观察到不同的触觉敏感度(d')和反应偏差(标准 c 和 c')模式。第三个实验研究了参与者在休息时采用不同手姿时的触觉感知。该实验还测试了自我/外部生成运动的简单准备与观察实验者执行这些目标运动之间的区别。由于感觉抑制,参与者在执行运动时对触觉刺激中的间隙检测的敏感度显著降低。准备接球仅会引发反应偏差的转变(即参与者在报告刺激中的间隙时更加宽松/保守),但与休息时相比,感知敏感度没有变化。准备投掷球会导致触觉敏感度显著降低,并且参与者的标准向更保守的方向转变,当响应目标存在时。观察自我发起的运动准备也会观察到类似的下降,但观察到的外部生成运动准备则没有。总的来说,这些结果表明,不同形式的衰减会影响触觉感知,这取决于执行的运动类型:自我发起的运动具有感知和决策衰减,而外部生成的运动仅具有决策衰减。这些结果表明,运动准备的运动感觉关联在额前决策相关皮质脑区已经被调节。