• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在缅因州医疗保险优势计划中,付费方-提供方合作实现了责任制医疗,减少了使用量并提高了质量。

Payer-provider collaboration in accountable care reduced use and improved quality in Maine Medicare Advantage plan.

机构信息

NovaHealth, and Infectious Diseases Division at the Maine Medical Center, Portland, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Sep;31(9):2074-83. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1141.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1141
PMID:22949458
Abstract

Patient-centered, accountable care has garnered increased attention with the passage of the Affordable Care Act and new Medicare regulations. This case study examines a care model jointly developed by a provider and a payer that approximates an accountable care organization for a Medicare Advantage population. The collaboration between Aetna and NovaHealth, an independent physician association based in Portland, Maine, focused on shared data, financial incentives, and care management to improve health outcomes for approximately 750 Medicare Advantage members. The patient population in the pilot program had 50 percent fewer hospital days per 1,000 patients, 45 percent fewer admissions, and 56 percent fewer readmissions than statewide unmanaged Medicare populations. NovaHealth's total per member per month costs across all cost categories for its Aetna Medicare Advantage members were 16.5 percent to 33 percent lower than costs for members not in this provider organization. Clinical quality metrics for diabetes, ischemic vascular disease, annual office visits, and postdischarge follow-up for patients in the program were consistently high. The experience of developing and implementing this collaborative care model suggests that several components are key, including robust data sharing and information systems that support it, analytical support, care management and coordination, and joint strategic planning with close provider-payer collaboration.

摘要

以患者为中心、问责制的医疗保健在《平价医疗法案》(Affordable Care Act)和新的医疗保险法规通过后受到了越来越多的关注。本案例研究考察了一种由提供者和支付方共同开发的、近似于医疗保险优势人群的问责制医疗组织的护理模式。安泰(Aetna)与缅因州波特兰市的独立医师协会 NovaHealth 之间的合作,侧重于共享数据、财务激励措施和护理管理,以改善大约 750 名医疗保险优势人群的健康结果。试点项目中的患者人群每千人住院天数减少 50%,住院人数减少 45%,再入院人数减少 56%,比全州未接受管理的医疗保险人群少。NovaHealth 的所有医疗保险优势会员的总每月每位会员成本,在所有费用类别中,比不在该医疗机构的会员的成本低 16.5%至 33%。该项目中糖尿病、缺血性血管疾病、年度门诊就诊和出院后随访的临床质量指标一直很高。开发和实施这种协作式护理模式的经验表明,几个因素是关键,包括强有力的数据共享和支持它的信息系统、分析支持、护理管理和协调,以及与密切的提供者-支付方合作进行联合战略规划。

相似文献

1
Payer-provider collaboration in accountable care reduced use and improved quality in Maine Medicare Advantage plan.在缅因州医疗保险优势计划中,付费方-提供方合作实现了责任制医疗,减少了使用量并提高了质量。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Sep;31(9):2074-83. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1141.
2
Medicare Advantage Chronic Special Needs Plan boosted primary care, reduced hospital use among diabetes patients.医疗保险优势慢性病特殊需求计划提高了初级保健水平,减少了糖尿病患者的住院使用量。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Jan;31(1):110-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0998.
3
A collaborative accountable care model in three practices showed promising early results on costs and quality of care.三个实践中的协作问责医疗模型在成本和医疗质量方面显示出了有希望的早期结果。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Nov;31(11):2379-87. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0354.
4
Accountable Care Organizations: roles and opportunities for hospitals.accountable care organizations:医院的角色与机遇。
Hosp Pract (1995). 2011 Aug;39(3):140-8. doi: 10.3810/hp.2011.08.589.
5
Adopting accountable care through the Medicare framework.通过医疗保险框架采用责任医疗。
Seton Hall Law Rev. 2012;42(4):1471-518.
6
A simulation shows limited savings from meeting quality targets under the Medicare Shared Savings Program.一项模拟研究显示,在联邦医疗保险共享储蓄计划下,要达到质量目标所节省的费用有限。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Nov;31(11):2554-62. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0385. Epub 2012 Oct 3.
7
Cost saving and quality of care in a pediatric accountable care organization.在儿科责任制医疗组织中节约成本和提高医疗质量。
Pediatrics. 2015 Mar;135(3):e582-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2725. Epub 2015 Feb 9.
8
Review of Medicare, Medicaid, and Commercial Quality of Care Measures: Considerations for Assessing Accountable Care Organizations.医疗保险、医疗补助和商业医疗质量衡量标准综述:评估责任医疗组织的考量因素
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2015 Aug;40(4):761-96. doi: 10.1215/03616878-3150050. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
9
Diabetes disease management in Medicare Advantage reduces hospitalizations and costs.医疗保险优势计划中的糖尿病疾病管理可减少住院和费用。
Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jul 1;16(7):e157-62.
10
Accountable care organizations: the proposed regulations and the prospects for success.责任医疗组织:拟议法规与成功前景。
Am J Manag Care. 2011;17(8):560-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Dissatisfaction With Care and Diabetes Self-Care Behaviors, Glycemic Management, and Quality of Life of Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.患者对护理的满意度与 2 型糖尿病患者的自我护理行为、血糖管理和生活质量之间的关系。
Diabetes Educ. 2020 Aug;46(4):370-377. doi: 10.1177/0145721720922953.
2
The Collaborative Payer Provider Model Enhances Primary Care, Producing Triple Aim Plus One Outcomes: A Cohort Study.协作式医保机构与医疗服务提供者模式改善初级医疗,实现“三重目标加一”成果:一项队列研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2017 Aug 27;5(3):48. doi: 10.3390/healthcare5030048.
3
Implementation Science Workshop: a Novel Multidisciplinary Primary Care Program to Improve Care and Outcomes for Super-Utilizers.
实施科学研讨会:一项旨在改善超级使用者的护理及结局的新型多学科初级保健项目。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Jul;31(7):797-802. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3598-1.
4
Do Health Care Delivery System Reforms Improve Value? The Jury Is Still Out.医疗服务提供系统改革能提升价值吗?尚无定论。
Med Care. 2016 Jan;54(1):55-66. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000445.
5
Emerging lessons from regional and state innovation in value-based payment reform: balancing collaboration and disruptive innovation.基于价值的支付改革中区域和州创新的新经验教训:平衡协作与颠覆性创新。
Milbank Q. 2014 Sep;92(3):568-623. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12078.
6
Provider and patient directed financial incentives to improve care and outcomes for patients with diabetes.为改善糖尿病患者的护理和治疗结果提供医患双方导向的财务激励措施。
Curr Diab Rep. 2013 Apr;13(2):188-95. doi: 10.1007/s11892-012-0353-9.