Brain Behav. 2012 Jul;2(4):499-523. doi: 10.1002/brb3.65. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
Stimulant dependence is associated with neuropsychological impairments. Here, we summarize and integrate the existing neuroimaging literature on the neural substrates of neuropsychological (dys)function in stimulant dependence, including cocaine, (meth-)amphetamine, ecstasy and nicotine dependence, and excessive caffeine use, comparing stimulant abusers (SAs) to nondrug using healthy controls (HCs). Despite some inconsistencies, most studies indicated altered brain activation in prefrontal cortex (PFC) and insula in response to reward and punishment, and higher limbic and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC)/PFC activation during craving and attentional bias paradigms in SAs compared with HCs. Impulsivity in SAs was associated with lower ACC and presupplementary motor area activity compared with HCs, and related to both ventral (amygdala, ventrolateral PFC, insula) and dorsal (dorsolateral PFC, dorsal ACC, posterior parietal cortex) systems. Decision making in SAs was associated with low dorsolateral PFC activity and high orbitofrontal activity. Finally, executive function in SAs was associated with lower activation in frontotemporal regions and higher activation in premotor cortex compared with HCs. It is concluded that the lower activations compared with HCs are likely to reflect the neural substrate of impaired neurocognitive functions, whereas higher activations in SAs compared with HCs are likely to reflect compensatory cognitive control mechanisms to keep behavioral task performance to a similar level as in HCs. However, before final conclusions can be drawn, additional research is needed using neuroimaging in SAs and HCs using larger and more homogeneous samples as well as more comparable task paradigms, study designs, and statistical analyses.
兴奋剂依赖与神经认知障碍有关。在这里,我们总结和整合了现有的关于兴奋剂依赖(包括可卡因、(甲基)苯丙胺、摇头丸和尼古丁依赖以及过度使用咖啡因)神经心理学(功能)障碍的神经影像学文献,将兴奋剂滥用者(SA)与非药物使用的健康对照(HC)进行了比较。尽管存在一些不一致之处,但大多数研究表明,与 HC 相比,SA 在奖励和惩罚反应中前额叶皮层(PFC)和脑岛的大脑活动发生改变,在渴望和注意力偏差范式中,边缘系统和前扣带皮层(ACC)/PFC 的激活程度更高。与 HC 相比,SA 的冲动性与 ACC 和补充运动前区的活性降低有关,并且与腹侧(杏仁核、腹外侧 PFC、脑岛)和背侧(背外侧 PFC、背侧 ACC、顶叶后皮质)系统都有关。SA 的决策与背外侧 PFC 活性降低和眶额皮质活性升高有关。最后,SA 的执行功能与额颞叶区域的激活降低和运动前皮质的激活升高有关。综上所述,与 HC 相比,SA 的低激活可能反映了神经认知功能受损的神经基础,而与 HC 相比,SA 的高激活可能反映了补偿性认知控制机制,以保持行为任务表现与 HC 相似的水平。然而,在得出最终结论之前,需要使用更大、更同质的样本以及更可比的任务范式、研究设计和统计分析,在 SA 和 HC 中使用神经影像学进行更多的研究。