McDermott Cian, Collins Niamh C
Centre for Emergency Medical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Emerg Med Int. 2012;2012:476161. doi: 10.1155/2012/476161. Epub 2012 Aug 16.
Introduction. Opioid overdose is an ever-increasing problem globally. Recent studies have demonstrated that intranasal (IN) naloxone is a safe and effective alternative to traditional routes of naloxone administration for reversal of opioid overdose. Aims. This randomised controlled trial aimed to compare the time taken to deliver intranasal medication with that of intravenous (IV) medication by advanced paramedic trainees. Methods. 18 advanced paramedic trainees administered either an IN or IV medication to a mannequin model in a classroom-based setting. The time taken for medication delivery was compared. End-user satisfaction was assessed using a 5-point questionnaire regarding ease of use and safety for both routes. Results. The mean time taken for the IN and IV group was 87.1 seconds and 178.2 seconds respectively. The difference in mean time taken was 91.1 seconds (95% confidence interval 55.2 seconds to 126.9 seconds, P ≤ 0.0001). 89% of advanced paramedic trainees reported that the IN route was easier and safer to use than the IV route. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that, amongst advanced paramedic trainees, the IN route of medication administration is significantly faster, better accepted and perceived to be safer than using the IV route. Thus, IN medication administration could be considered more frequently when administering emergency medications in a pre-hospital setting.
引言。阿片类药物过量是全球范围内日益严重的问题。最近的研究表明,鼻内(IN)纳洛酮是用于逆转阿片类药物过量的传统纳洛酮给药途径的一种安全有效的替代方法。目的。这项随机对照试验旨在比较高级护理人员学员给予鼻内药物和静脉内(IV)药物所需的时间。方法。18名高级护理人员学员在基于教室的环境中向人体模型给予鼻内或静脉内药物。比较给药所需的时间。使用关于两种途径的易用性和安全性的5分问卷评估最终用户满意度。结果。鼻内组和静脉内组的平均给药时间分别为87.1秒和178.2秒。平均给药时间差异为91.1秒(置信区间95%为55.2秒至126.9秒,P≤0.0001)。8%的高级护理人员学员报告说,鼻内给药途径比静脉内给药途径更容易且更安全。结论。这项研究表明,在高级护理人员学员中,鼻内给药途径明显更快,更易被接受,且被认为比静脉内给药途径更安全。因此,在院前环境中给予紧急药物时,可以更频繁地考虑鼻内给药。