Smith R C, Greenbaum D S, Vancouver J B, Henry R C, Reinhart M A, Greenbaum R B, Dean H A, Mayle J E
Department of Medicine, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing.
Gastroenterology. 1990 Feb;98(2):293-301. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(90)90817-k.
The objective of this prospective study was to test the hypothesis that 6 reportedly important psychosocial factors were useful criteria for diagnosing the irritable bowel syndrome. Ninety-seven new patients with entry complaints of abdominal pain, altered bowel habits, or both underwent full evaluation by board-certified or -eligible gastroenterologists in an outpatient setting. The independent measures were 6 questionnaires concerning anxiety, depression, stress, lack of social support, somatization, and abnormal illness behavior. The dependent measure, irritable bowel syndrome, was defined as the absence of an organic disease explanation for patients' entry complaints. Two other board-certified gastroenterologists, independent of the study, made this determination. Their rating was based on full review of transcripts of patients' clinic visits, laboratory data, and the results of a 9-mo telephone follow-up to patients and their physicians. Sixty-five percent of the sample had no organic disease explanation for the entry symptoms, thereby representing irritable bowel syndrome. The psychosocial predictors did not show a significant association with irritable bowel syndrome; the power of the study was 0.86. Post hoc analysis revealed that patients with organic disease, as well as patients with irritable bowel syndrome, had significantly more (p less than 0.01) psychosocial abnormality than normal subjects, which likely contributed to the inability of the psychosocial predictors to distinguish irritable bowel syndrome from organic disease. It was concluded that psychosocial criteria were of limited value in differentiating irritable bowel syndrome from organic disease but that they were determinants of health care seeking for the entire study group.
6种据报道很重要的社会心理因素是诊断肠易激综合征的有用标准。97名以腹痛、排便习惯改变或两者为初发症状的新患者,在门诊环境中接受了经委员会认证或符合条件的胃肠病学家的全面评估。独立测量方法是6份关于焦虑、抑郁、压力、缺乏社会支持、躯体化和异常疾病行为的问卷调查。因变量肠易激综合征的定义为患者初发症状不存在器质性疾病解释。另外两名独立于该研究的经委员会认证的胃肠病学家做出了这一判定。他们的评级基于对患者门诊记录、实验室数据以及对患者及其医生进行的9个月电话随访结果的全面审查。65%的样本初发症状不存在器质性疾病解释,因此代表肠易激综合征。社会心理预测因素与肠易激综合征未显示出显著关联;该研究的检验效能为0.86。事后分析显示,患有器质性疾病的患者以及患有肠易激综合征的患者,其社会心理异常情况显著多于正常受试者(p<0.01),这可能导致社会心理预测因素无法区分肠易激综合征和器质性疾病。研究得出结论,社会心理标准在区分肠易激综合征和器质性疾病方面价值有限,但它们是整个研究组寻求医疗保健的决定因素。