Prondzinsky Roland, Unverzagt Susanne, Carter Justin M, Mahnkopf Dirk, Buerke Michael, Werdan Karl, Heinroth Konstantin M
Department of Medicine I, Carl von Basedow-Klinikum, Merseburg, Germany.
J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Sep;24(9):451-5.
Transcoronary pacing for the treatment of bradycardias during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a useful technique in interventional cardiology. The standard technique is unipolar pacing with the guidewire in the coronary artery against a cutaneous patch electrode. We developed a novel approach for transcoronary pacing by using intravascular electrodes in different positions in the aorta in a porcine model.
Unipolar transcoronary pacing was applied in 8 pigs under general anesthesia using a standard floppy guidewire in a coronary artery as the cathode with additional insulation of the guidewire by a monorail angioplasty balloon. Intravascular electrodes positioned in the aorta thoracalis and the aorta abdominalis served as indifferent anodes. The efficacy of transcoronary pacing with intravascular anodal electrodes was assessed by measurement of threshold and impedance data and the magnitude of the epicardial electrogram in comparison to unipolar transvenous pacing using the same indifferent anodal electrodes. Transcoronary pacing with the guidewire-balloon combination using indifferent intravascular electrodes was effective in all cases. Transcoronary pacing thresholds obtained against the indifferent coil electrodes in the aorta thoracalis (0.8 ± 0.5 V) and in the aorta abdominalis (0.8 ± 0.5 V) were similar to those obtained with unipolar transvenous pacing (0.7 ± 0.3 V and 0.6 ± 0.2 V, respectively), whereas the tip-electrode in the aorta thoracalis serving as indifferent anode produced significantly higher pacing thresholds (guidewire, 2.8 ± 2.6 V; transvenous lead, 1.5 ± 0.8 V). The lower pacing threshold of the coil-electrodes was associated with significantly lower impedance values (aorta thoracalis, 285 ± 63 ohm; aorta abdominalis, 294 ± 61 ohm) as compared to the tip-electrode in the aorta thoracalis (718 ± 254 ohm). The amplitude of the epicardial electrogram acquired by the intracoronary guidewire was without significant differences between the indifferent electrodes.
Transcoronary pacing in the animal model using a standard guidewire with balloon insulation and intravascular indifferent electrodes is depending on the optimal configuration of the anodal electrode. The use of intravascular coil electrodes with a sufficient surface area can produce 100% capture at thresholds comparable to transvenous pacing. Therefore, technical integration of these coil electrodes into the access sheath or the guiding catheter with respect to handling these tools in daily clinical practice in the catheterization laboratory could further facilitate the transcoronary pacing approach.
经冠状动脉起搏用于在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)期间治疗心动过缓,是介入心脏病学中的一项有用技术。标准技术是将冠状动脉内的导丝作为阴极,与皮肤贴片电极进行单极起搏。我们在猪模型中开发了一种通过在主动脉的不同位置使用血管内电极进行经冠状动脉起搏的新方法。
在全身麻醉下,对8头猪进行单极经冠状动脉起搏,使用冠状动脉内的标准软头导丝作为阴极,并通过单轨血管成形术球囊对导丝进行额外绝缘。置于胸主动脉和腹主动脉的血管内电极用作无关阳极。通过测量阈值和阻抗数据以及与使用相同无关阳极的单极经静脉起搏相比的心外膜电图幅度,评估血管内阳极电极经冠状动脉起搏的效果。使用无关血管内电极的导丝 - 球囊组合进行经冠状动脉起搏在所有病例中均有效。与胸主动脉(0.8±0.5V)和腹主动脉(0.8±0.5V)中的无关线圈电极相比,经冠状动脉起搏阈值与单极经静脉起搏获得的阈值相似(分别为0.7±0.3V和0.6±0.2V),而胸主动脉中用作无关阳极的尖端电极产生的起搏阈值明显更高(导丝,2.8±2.6V;经静脉导线,1.5±0.8V)。与胸主动脉中的尖端电极(718±254欧姆)相比,线圈电极较低的起搏阈值与明显较低的阻抗值相关(胸主动脉,285±63欧姆;腹主动脉,294±61欧姆)。冠状动脉内导丝获取的心外膜电图幅度在无关电极之间无显著差异。
在动物模型中,使用带有球囊绝缘的标准导丝和血管内无关电极进行经冠状动脉起搏取决于阳极电极的最佳配置。使用具有足够表面积的血管内线圈电极可以在与经静脉起搏相当的阈值下实现100%夺获。因此,在导管实验室的日常临床实践中,将这些线圈电极在操作这些工具方面技术整合到接入鞘或引导导管中,可以进一步促进经冠状动脉起搏方法。