Pastoral Ministries, Brooksby Village, Peabody, Massachusetts 10960, USA.
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2012 Sep;33(9):577-82. doi: 10.3109/01612840.2012.704130.
Religion, spirituality, and psychiatric illnesses share a complex relationship in the realm of diagnosis. Historically, however, these three constructs have existed in a very peripheral place in the diagnostic taxonomy for psychiatry in the United States. Given the important role that spirituality and religion play for many people in the experiences of coping with health and illness, it seems odd that such important elements are in the margins of the powerful and commanding nosology of the DSM. Explanations for understanding the glaring absence are complex and impacted by some very powerful political and sociological forces, including contributory elements from within the mental health disciplines. This article invites the reader to explore salient issues in the emergence of a broader recognition of religion, spirituality and psychiatric diagnosis in the DSM-5.
宗教、精神信仰和精神疾病在诊断领域存在复杂的关系。然而,在历史上,这三个概念在美国精神病学的诊断分类学中一直处于非常次要的地位。鉴于精神信仰和宗教在许多人应对健康和疾病的体验中扮演着重要角色,精神疾病诊断与统计手册(DSM)这一强大而权威的分类学却将这些重要元素边缘化,这似乎有些奇怪。对于理解这种明显缺失的原因的解释是复杂的,受到一些非常强大的政治和社会学力量的影响,包括来自心理健康学科内部的因素。本文邀请读者探讨在 DSM-5 中更广泛地认识宗教、精神信仰和精神疾病诊断方面出现的突出问题。