Department of Urology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Eur Urol. 2013 Mar;63(3):486-92. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.08.062. Epub 2012 Sep 5.
Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is used to obtain local control of small renal masses. However, available long-term oncologic outcomes for RFA of RCC are limited by small numbers, short follow-up, and lack of pathologic diagnoses.
To assess the oncologic effectiveness of RFA for the treatment of biopsy-proven RCC.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Exclusion criteria included prior RCC or metastatic RCC, familial syndromes, or T2 RCC. We retrospectively reviewed long-term oncologic outcomes for 185 patients with sporadic T1 RCC. Median follow-up was 6.43 yr (interquartile range [IQR]: 5.3-7.7).
The chi-square test and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare proportions and medians, respectively. Disease-specific survival and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, then stratified by tumor stage, and comparisons were made using log-rank analysis. The 5-yr disease-free survival (DFS) and OS rates are reported. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Median tumor size was 3 cm (IQR: 2.1-3.9 cm). Tumor stage was T1a: 143 (77.3%) or T1b: 42 (22.7%). Twenty-four patients (13%) were retreated for residual disease. There were 12 local recurrences (6.5%), 6 recurrences in T1a disease (4.2%) and 6 in T1b disease (14.3%) (p=0.0196). Median time to recurrence was 2.5 yr. Local salvage RFA was performed in six patients, of whom five remain disease free at 3.8-yr median follow-up. Tumor stage was the only significant predictor of DFS on multivariate analysis. At last follow-up, 164 patients (88.6%) were disease free (T1a: n=132 [92.3%]; T1b: n=32 [76.2%]; p=0.0038). OS was similar regardless of stage (p=0.06). Five patients developed metachronous renal tumors (2.7%). Four patients developed extrarenal metastases (2.2%), three of whom died of metastatic RCC (1.6%).
In poor surgical candidates, RFA results in durable local control and low risk of recurrence in T1a RCC. Higher stage correlates with a decreased disease-free survival. Long-term surveillance is necessary following RFA. Patient selection based on tumor characteristics, comorbid disease, and life expectancy is of paramount importance.
射频消融(RFA)治疗肾细胞癌(RCC)用于获得小肾肿瘤的局部控制。然而,RFA 治疗 RCC 的可用长期肿瘤学结果受到数量少、随访时间短和缺乏病理诊断的限制。
评估 RFA 治疗经活检证实的 RCC 的肿瘤学疗效。
设计、地点和参与者:排除标准包括先前的 RCC 或转移性 RCC、家族综合征或 T2 RCC。我们回顾性分析了 185 例散发性 T1 RCC 患者的长期肿瘤学结果。中位随访时间为 6.43 年(四分位距[IQR]:5.3-7.7)。
卡方检验和 Wilcoxon 秩和检验分别用于比较比例和中位数。使用 Kaplan-Meier 分析计算疾病特异性生存率和总生存率(OS),然后按肿瘤分期分层,并使用对数秩检验进行比较。报告 5 年无病生存率(DFS)和 OS 率。p 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
中位肿瘤大小为 3 cm(IQR:2.1-3.9 cm)。肿瘤分期为 T1a:143 例(77.3%)或 T1b:42 例(22.7%)。24 例(13%)因残留疾病接受了再次治疗。有 12 例局部复发(6.5%),T1a 疾病 6 例(4.2%)和 T1b 疾病 6 例(14.3%)(p=0.0196)。中位复发时间为 2.5 年。6 例患者进行了局部挽救性 RFA,其中 5 例在中位随访 3.8 年后仍无疾病。肿瘤分期是多变量分析中唯一显著的 DFS 预测因素。在最后一次随访时,164 例患者(88.6%)无疾病(T1a:n=132 [92.3%];T1b:n=32 [76.2%];p=0.0038)。OS 与分期无关(p=0.06)。5 例患者发生了肾外转移(2.7%)。4 例患者发生了肾外转移(2.2%),其中 3 例死于转移性 RCC(1.6%)。
在手术效果不佳的患者中,RFA 可实现持久的局部控制和降低 T1a RCC 复发风险。较高的分期与较低的无病生存率相关。RFA 后需要长期监测。基于肿瘤特征、合并症和预期寿命的患者选择至关重要。