Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Nov;144(5):1067-1074.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.08.029. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
Our objectives were to determine the prevalence of pulmonary hypertension (PHT) in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) for severe aortic stenosis (AS), characterize risk for PHT, assess changes in PHT, and analyze its effect on outcomes.
From January 1996 to July 2010, a total of 4372 patients with severe AS underwent primary AVR. Right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP), a surrogate for PHT, was estimated echocardiographically in 2385, the study group. Preoperative RVSP was less than 35 mm Hg (low pressure) in 611, 35 to 50 mm Hg (moderate PHT) in 1199, and greater than 50 mm Hg (high PHT) in 575. From active follow-up, 10,218 patient-years were available for survival analysis and 3716 echocardiograms after AVR for assessing RVSP.
Median preoperative RVSP was 41 mm Hg (range, 10-104 mm Hg). Older, more symptomatic female patients with more comorbidities and tricuspid or mitral regurgitation had higher RVSP. Hospital mortality was higher in those with higher RVSP (0.9% low presssure, 1.9% moderate PHT, 3.1% high PHT, P = .03), as was risk of renal (P < .0001) or respiratory failure (P < .0001), sepsis (P = .01), and prolonged hospitalization (P < .0001). Initial post-AVR RVSP improvement was not maintained but rose to preoperative levels by 3 to 4 years. Long-term survival was worse in patients with higher RVSP (P < .0001): 85% and 63% low pressure; 77% and 45% moderate PHT; and 62% and 31% high PHT at 5 and 10 years, respectively.
Most patients undergoing primary AVR have at least moderate PHT that is not relieved by AVR; its severity is associated with mortality, serious complications, and worse late survival. PHT severity should be included in risk assessment before aortic valve intervention. These outcomes suggest that earlier intervention for AS warrants further study.
本研究旨在确定行主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)患者的肺动脉高压(PHT)患病率,明确 PHT 风险因素,评估 PHT 变化,并分析其对预后的影响。
1996 年 1 月至 2010 年 7 月,共有 4372 例重度 AS 患者接受了 AVR。其中 2385 例(研究组)患者行超声心动图检查,估算右心室收缩压(RVSP)作为 PHT 的替代指标。术前 RVSP<35mmHg(低压力)者 611 例,35-50mmHg(中度 PHT)者 1199 例,>50mmHg(重度 PHT)者 575 例。从主动随访中获得 10218 患者年用于生存分析,3716 例 AVR 后用于评估 RVSP 的超声心动图。
中位术前 RVSP 为 41mmHg(范围 10-104mmHg)。年龄较大、症状较重、合并症较多的女性患者及合并三尖瓣或二尖瓣反流者 RVSP 更高。RVSP 较高的患者院内死亡率更高(0.9%低压力,1.9%中度 PHT,3.1%重度 PHT,P=0.03),肾功能衰竭(P<0.0001)或呼吸衰竭(P<0.0001)、脓毒症(P=0.01)和住院时间延长(P<0.0001)的风险也更高。AVR 后初始 RVSP 改善未维持,3-4 年后回升至术前水平。RVSP 较高的患者长期生存率更差(P<0.0001):5 年时分别为 85%和 63%低压力;77%和 45%中度 PHT;62%和 31%重度 PHT;10 年时分别为 63%和 41%低压力;77%和 45%中度 PHT;62%和 31%重度 PHT。
大多数行 AVR 治疗的患者至少存在中度 PHT,AVR 不能缓解该疾病;其严重程度与死亡率、严重并发症和晚期生存率较差相关。在进行主动脉瓣干预之前,应将 PHT 严重程度纳入风险评估中。这些结果表明,AS 的早期干预值得进一步研究。