Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, 3620 McClintock Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
Neuroimage. 2012 Dec;63(4):1818-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.066. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
Behavioral studies and single cell recordings in monkey inferotemporal cortex have documented greater sensitivity to differences in viewpoint invariant or nonaccidental properties (e.g., straight vs. curved), than metric properties (e.g., degree of curvature) of simple shapes. Are we similarly more sensitive to nonaccidental (NAP) than metric (MP) differences of the relations between objects? We addressed this question with sets of scene triplets that could, from a reference or "Base" scene (e.g., a brick slightly separated from a cylinder), undergo a NAP relational change (e.g., the brick attached to the cylinder) or an MP relational change (e.g., the brick further separated from the cylinder). Critically, both relational variations were matched in physical dissimilarity using pixel energy and the Gabor-jet system, a model of V1 similarity. In an adaptive staircase match-to-sample paradigm, subjects required more than double the presentation durations for detecting differences in MP than NAP relations to achieve equivalent levels of accuracy. In two fMRI experiments, NAP changes consistently produced greater responses in the lateral occipital cortex (LO), but not in earlier retinotopic stages, compared to MP changes, implicating LO as the potential neural locus for where the greater detectability of the differences of NAPs than MPs is made explicit. HMAX, a model of cell tuning in higher-level ventral visual areas, did not consistently reflect the marked NAP advantage witnessed in behavioral performance and in LO responses.
猴子下颞叶皮层的行为研究和单细胞记录表明,对视图不变或非偶然属性(例如,直线与曲线)的差异的敏感性高于对简单形状的度量属性(例如,曲率程度)的敏感性。我们对物体之间的非偶然(NAP)差异是否比对度量(MP)差异更敏感?我们使用一组场景三元组来解决这个问题,这些三元组可以从参考或“基础”场景(例如,稍微与圆柱体分开的砖块)经历 NAP 关系变化(例如,砖块附接到圆柱体上)或 MP 关系变化(例如,砖块进一步与圆柱体分开)。关键是,使用像素能量和 Gabor-jet 系统(V1 相似性的模型)对两种关系变化进行物理相似性匹配,使两者的关系变化在物理差异上相匹配。在自适应阶梯匹配样本范式中,与检测 MP 关系差异相比,检测 NAP 关系差异的呈现持续时间需要增加一倍以上,才能达到等效的准确性水平。在两项 fMRI 实验中,与 MP 变化相比,NAP 变化一致地在外侧枕叶皮层(LO)中产生更大的反应,但在早期的视网膜阶段没有产生更大的反应,这表明 LO 是差异的可检测性的潜在神经位置比 MPs 更明显。HMAX 是高级腹侧视觉区域细胞调谐的模型,它并没有一致地反映出行为表现和 LO 反应中明显的 NAP 优势。