Department of Medical Education, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL, USA.
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2012;40(3):390-8.
There has been great debate concerning the existence and meaning of compensation neurosis. It is included in the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 and -10 but not listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR). On the eve of publication of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), we re-examine the history and concept of compensation neurosis and conceptually update the condition to reflect current psychiatric thought. We consider its utility as a diagnostic entity for forensic evaluations and its components as they relate to exaggeration in injury claims. We also discuss how compensation neurosis differs from malingering and factitious disorder.
关于赔偿神经症的存在和意义一直存在很大的争议。它被列入国际疾病分类(ICD)第 9 版和第 10 版,但未列入精神障碍诊断与统计手册,第四版,文字修订版(DSM-IV-TR)。在精神障碍诊断与统计手册,第五版(DSM-5)出版前夕,我们重新审视了赔偿神经症的历史和概念,并从概念上更新了该病症,以反映当前的精神病学思想。我们考虑了它作为法医评估诊断实体的效用及其与夸大伤害索赔相关的组成部分。我们还讨论了赔偿神经症与诈病和做作性障碍的区别。