Delis Dean C, Wetter Spencer R
Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, School of Medicine, University of California-San Diego, 3350 La Jolla Village Drive, CA 92161, USA.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Jun;22(5):589-604. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2007.04.001. Epub 2007 May 7.
In neuropsychological practice, individuals often present with evidence of excessive cognitive complaints or invalid test performances indicative of symptom exaggeration; however, clinicians often struggle with how to diagnose these cases once they have been identified. Difficulties in subsuming these individuals within existing DSM-IV diagnoses such as Malingering, Factitious Disorder, and Conversion Disorder are discussed, including: (a) lack of a diagnostic category that adequately targets the specific features of this relatively common condition and (b) the use of criteria that require the clinician to make judgments about internal states that are difficult to evaluate in an objective manner (e.g., intentional versus unintentional production of exaggerated symptoms). Two diagnostic categories--Cogniform Disorder and Cogniform Condition--are proposed as new subtypes of the Somatoform Disorders to encompass cases of excessive cognitive complaints and inadequate test-taking effort in the absence of sufficient evidence to diagnose Malingering. Of the two new categories, Cogniform Disorder is defined as a more pervasive form in which the individual tends to exhibit the excessive cognitive symptoms in widespread areas of his or her life, thereby suggesting a conversion-like adoption of the sick role manifested primarily as cognitive dysfunction. Guidelines for improving the evidence-based diagnosis of these cases, particularly with regards to criteria related to intentionality, secondary gain, and sick role factors, are also discussed.
在神经心理学实践中,个体常常表现出过度认知主诉的证据或表明症状夸大的无效测试表现;然而,一旦识别出这些病例,临床医生往往难以确定如何对其进行诊断。本文讨论了将这些个体归入现有《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)诊断(如诈病、做作性障碍和转换障碍)的困难,包括:(a)缺乏一个能充分针对这种相对常见情况的特定特征的诊断类别,以及(b)使用的标准要求临床医生对难以客观评估的内部状态进行判断(例如,故意与非故意产生夸大症状)。提出了两个诊断类别——认知形式障碍和认知形式状况——作为躯体形式障碍的新亚型,以涵盖在缺乏足够证据诊断诈病的情况下出现过度认知主诉和测试努力不足的病例。在这两个新类别中,认知形式障碍被定义为一种更普遍的形式,个体倾向于在其生活的广泛领域表现出过度认知症状,从而暗示一种类似转换的患病角色的采用,主要表现为认知功能障碍。本文还讨论了改进这些病例循证诊断的指南,特别是关于与故意性、继发获益和患病角色因素相关的标准。