• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测顺铂-长春瑞滨治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤疗效的生物标志物谱。

A biomarker profile for predicting efficacy of cisplatin-vinorelbine therapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, National University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012 Nov;70(5):743-54. doi: 10.1007/s00280-012-1965-0. Epub 2012 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00280-012-1965-0
PMID:22960937
Abstract

PURPOSE

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) has a dismal prognosis. Treatment results may be improved by biomarker-directed therapy. We investigated the baseline expression and impact on outcome of predictive biomarkers ERCC1, BRCA1, and class III β-tubulin in a cohort of MPM patients treated with cisplatin-vinorelbine. We further explored the possibility of combining markers into a treatment-response profile to increase the predictive power.

METHODS

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor specimens from 54 MPM patients included in a phase II trial were evaluated for ERCC1, BRCA1, and class III β-tubulin by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Immunostaining was quantified by an H-score and dichotomized according to upper quartile values. The ERCC1- and class III β-tubulin-status classified patients as treatment resistant (ERCC1 positive + class III β-tubulin positive) or treatment responsive (ERCC1 negative + class III β-tubulin negative). The remaining marker combinations were considered inconclusive.

RESULTS

Fifty patients had tumor tissue available for IHC. Eleven had a responsive profile, and nine had a resistant profile. Thirty patients had an inconclusive profile. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.7 months in the treatment-resistant group, 15.3 months in the treatment-responsive group, and 8.1 months in the inconclusive group (log-rank p = 0.03). Multivariate analysis revealed that treatment-resistant patients had a decreased PFS and overall survival (OS) compared with the treatment-responsive patients (HR 6.45, CI 95 % [2.02-20.64] p = 0.002 and HR 4.64, CI 95 % [1.56-13.79], p = 0.006, respectively). BRCA1 status was associated with neither PFS nor OS.

CONCLUSION

Combined negative ERCC1 and class III β-tubulin immunostaining is associated with significantly prolonged PFS and OS in MPM patients receiving cisplatin-vinorelbine therapy.

摘要

目的

恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MPM)预后不良。通过生物标志物指导的治疗,可能会改善治疗结果。我们研究了在接受顺铂-长春瑞滨治疗的 MPM 患者队列中,预测生物标志物 ERCC1、BRCA1 和 III 类 β-微管蛋白的基线表达及其对结果的影响。我们进一步探索了将标志物组合成治疗反应谱以提高预测能力的可能性。

方法

对 54 名参与 II 期临床试验的 MPM 患者的福尔马林固定石蜡包埋肿瘤标本进行 ERCC1、BRCA1 和 III 类 β-微管蛋白的免疫组织化学(IHC)检测。免疫染色通过 H 评分进行量化,并根据上四分位数值进行二分类。根据 ERCC1 状态和 III 类 β-微管蛋白状态将患者分为治疗抵抗(ERCC1 阳性+III 类 β-微管蛋白阳性)或治疗敏感(ERCC1 阴性+III 类 β-微管蛋白阴性)。其余的标志物组合被认为是不确定的。

结果

50 名患者有肿瘤组织进行 IHC。11 名患者具有反应性特征,9 名患者具有抵抗性特征。30 名患者的特征不确定。治疗抵抗组的中位无进展生存期(PFS)为 6.7 个月,治疗敏感组为 15.3 个月,不确定组为 8.1 个月(对数秩检验 p=0.03)。多变量分析显示,与治疗敏感组相比,治疗抵抗组的 PFS 和总生存期(OS)降低(HR 6.45,95%CI [2.02-20.64],p=0.002 和 HR 4.64,95%CI [1.56-13.79],p=0.006)。BRCA1 状态与 PFS 或 OS 均无关。

结论

在接受顺铂-长春瑞滨治疗的 MPM 患者中,联合阴性 ERCC1 和 III 类 β-微管蛋白免疫染色与 PFS 和 OS 显著延长相关。

相似文献

1
A biomarker profile for predicting efficacy of cisplatin-vinorelbine therapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma.预测顺铂-长春瑞滨治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤疗效的生物标志物谱。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2012 Nov;70(5):743-54. doi: 10.1007/s00280-012-1965-0. Epub 2012 Sep 8.
2
Low ERCC1 expression in malignant pleural mesotheliomas treated with cisplatin and vinorelbine predicts prolonged progression-free survival.在接受顺铂和长春瑞滨治疗的恶性胸膜间皮瘤中,低 ERCC1 表达预示着无进展生存期延长。
J Thorac Oncol. 2012 Jan;7(1):249-56. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318233d6a9.
3
Expression of ERCC1 and class III beta-tubulin in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with carboplatin and paclitaxel.ERCC1和III类β-微管蛋白在接受卡铂和紫杉醇治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者中的表达
Lung Cancer. 2009 Jun;64(3):326-33. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2008.09.002. Epub 2008 Nov 1.
4
[Prognosis related clinical and molecular factors in malignant pleural mesothelioma].恶性胸膜间皮瘤的预后相关临床和分子因素
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2013 Mar;36(3):162-8.
5
Expression of ERCC1 and class III beta-tubulin in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with a combination of cisplatin/docetaxel and concurrent thoracic irradiation.顺铂/多西他赛联合同期胸部放疗治疗的非小细胞肺癌患者中ERCC1和III类β微管蛋白的表达
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009 Aug;64(3):565-73. doi: 10.1007/s00280-008-0907-3. Epub 2009 Jan 3.
6
Thymidylate synthase and excision repair cross-complementing group-1 as predictors of responsiveness in mesothelioma patients treated with pemetrexed/carboplatin.胸苷酸合成酶和切除修复交叉互补组 1 作为预测培美曲塞/卡铂治疗间皮瘤患者反应的标志物。
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Apr 15;17(8):2581-90. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2873. Epub 2011 Jan 24.
7
Predictive value of APE1, BRCA1, ERCC1 and TUBB3 expression in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving first-line platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy.APE1、BRCA1、ERCC1和TUBB3表达对接受一线铂类-紫杉醇化疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的预测价值。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2014 Oct;74(4):777-86. doi: 10.1007/s00280-014-2562-1. Epub 2014 Aug 9.
8
Thoracic stop-flow perfusion in the treatment of refractory malignant pleural mesothelioma: a phase I-II evaluation/trial.胸部阻断血流灌注治疗难治性恶性胸膜间皮瘤:一项I-II期评估/试验
In Vivo. 2006 Nov-Dec;20(6A):715-8.
9
Second-line chemotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma: results of a retrospective multicenter survey.恶性胸膜间皮瘤二线化疗:回顾性多中心调查结果。
Lung Cancer. 2012 Mar;75(3):360-7. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.08.011. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
10
ERCC1, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and βIII-tubulin: resistance proteins associated with response and outcome to platinum-based chemotherapy in malignant pleural mesothelioma.ERCC1、MLH1、MSH2、MSH6 和 βIII-微管蛋白:与恶性胸膜间皮瘤对铂类化疗的反应和预后相关的耐药蛋白。
Clin Lung Cancer. 2013 Sep;14(5):558-567.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2013.04.013. Epub 2013 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of new treatments proposed for malignant pleural mesothelioma raises concerns about the conduction of clinical trials in oncology.对恶性胸膜间皮瘤提出的新治疗方法的分析引发了人们对肿瘤学临床试验实施的担忧。
J Transl Med. 2022 Dec 13;20(1):593. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03744-6.
2
Chemosensitivity and resistance testing in malignant effusions with focus on primary malignant mesothelioma and metastatic adenocarcinoma.恶性胸腔积液中的化学敏感性和耐药性检测,重点关注原发性恶性间皮瘤和转移性腺癌。
Pleura Peritoneum. 2016 Sep 1;1(3):119-133. doi: 10.1515/pp-2016-0013. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
3
Secreted primary human malignant mesothelioma exosome signature reflects oncogenic cargo.
分泌型原发性人恶性间皮瘤外泌体特征反映致癌货物。
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 8;6:32643. doi: 10.1038/srep32643.
4
Predictive value of BRCA1 expression on the efficacy of chemotherapy based on anti-microtubule agents: a pooled analysis across different malignancies and agents.BRCA1 表达对抗微管药物化疗疗效的预测价值:不同恶性肿瘤和药物的汇总分析。
Ann Transl Med. 2016 Mar;4(6):110. doi: 10.21037/atm.2016.03.27.
5
A five-variable signature predicts radioresistance and prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients receiving radical radiotherapy.一种五变量特征可预测接受根治性放疗的鼻咽癌患者的放射抗性和预后。
Tumour Biol. 2016 Mar;37(3):2941-9. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4139-y. Epub 2015 Sep 27.
6
Characterization and drug sensitivity profiling of primary malignant mesothelioma cells from pleural effusions.来自胸腔积液的原发性恶性间皮瘤细胞的特征分析及药敏谱分析
BMC Cancer. 2014 Sep 24;14:709. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-709.
7
Activation of AKT/ERK confers non-small cell lung cancer cells resistance to vinorelbine.AKT/ERK的激活赋予非小细胞肺癌细胞对长春瑞滨的抗性。
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2013 Dec 15;7(1):134-43. eCollection 2014.
8
Malignant pleural mesothelioma: current and future perspectives.恶性胸膜间皮瘤:现状与未来展望
J Thorac Dis. 2013 Sep;5 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S397-406. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.08.08.
9
Variation in drug sensitivity of malignant mesothelioma cell lines with substantial effects of selenite and bortezomib, highlights need for individualized therapy.硒代硫酸钠和硼替佐米对恶性间皮瘤细胞系的药物敏感性存在显著影响,提示需要个体化治疗。
PLoS One. 2013 Jun 20;8(6):e65903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065903. Print 2013.