Mura Gioia, Petretto Donatella Rita, Bhat Krishna M, Carta Mauro Giovanni
Consultation Liaison Psychiatric Unit at the University Hospital of Cagliari, University of Cagliari and AOU Cagliari - Italy.
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2012;8:52-66. doi: 10.2174/1745017901208010052. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: We discuss recent evidences about schizophrenia (frequency, onset, course, risk factors and genetics) and their influences to some epidemiological myths about schizophrenia diffuse between psychiatric and psychopathology clinicians. The scope is to evaluate if the new acquisitions may change the rehabilitation approaches to schizophrenia modifying the balance about the neurodevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenia accepting that the cognitive deficits are produced by errors during the normal development of the brain (neurodevelopmental hypothesis) that remains stable in the course of illness and the neurodegenerative hypothesis according of which they derived from a degenerative process that goes on inexorably.
RESEARCH METHOD/DESIGN: A review of the literature about epidemiology of schizophrenia has been performed and the contributions of some of these evidence to neurodevelopmental hypothesis and to rehabilitation has been described.
It cannot be definitively concluded for or against the neurodevelopmental or degenerative hypothesis, but efforts in understanding basis of schizophrenia must go on. Until now, rehabilitation programs are based on the vulnerability-stress model: supposing an early deficit that go on stable during the life under favorable circumstances. So, rehabilitation approaches (as neuro-cognitive approaches, social skill training, cognitive-emotional training) are focused on the individual and micro-group coping skills, aiming to help people with schizophrenia to cope with environmental stress factors.
CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Coping of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia may represents the starting-point for further research on schizophrenia, cohort studies and randomized trials are necessary to defined the range of effectiveness and the outcome of the treatments.
目的/目标:我们讨论关于精神分裂症的最新证据(发病率、发病、病程、危险因素和遗传学)及其对一些在精神科和精神病理学临床医生中流传的关于精神分裂症的流行病学误区的影响。范围是评估这些新发现是否可能改变精神分裂症的康复方法,改变对精神分裂症神经发育假说的平衡,该假说认为认知缺陷是由大脑正常发育过程中的错误产生的(神经发育假说),在疾病过程中保持稳定,以及神经退行性假说,根据该假说认知缺陷源自一个不可阻挡地持续的退行性过程。
研究方法/设计:对关于精神分裂症流行病学的文献进行了综述,并描述了其中一些证据对神经发育假说和康复的贡献。
不能明确支持或反对神经发育或退行性假说,但对精神分裂症基础的理解仍需继续努力。到目前为止,康复项目基于易感性-应激模型:假设存在一个早期缺陷,在有利环境下在一生中保持稳定。因此,康复方法(如神经认知方法、社交技能训练、认知情感训练)侧重于个体和微小组应对技能,旨在帮助精神分裂症患者应对环境应激因素。
结论/启示:应对精神分裂症中的认知缺陷可能是精神分裂症进一步研究的起点,队列研究和随机试验对于确定治疗的有效性范围和结果是必要的。