Suppr超能文献

[通过认知矫正预防精神分裂症中的暴力行为]

[Preventing violence in schizophrenia with cognitive remediation].

作者信息

Darmedru C, Demily C, Franck N

机构信息

UMD, centre hospitalier Le Vinatier, 95, boulevard Pinel, 69500 Bron, France.

GenoPsy, centre hospitalier le Vinatier, 95, boulevard Pinel, 69500 Bron, France; Faculté de médecine Charles Mérieux Lyon Sud, université Lyon 1, 43, boulevard du 11-novembre-1918, 69100 Villeurbanne, France.

出版信息

Encephale. 2018 Apr;44(2):158-167. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 Jun 20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The association between schizophrenia and violence represents an important issue in psychiatry. Often highly publicized, violent acts raise the question of their detection, prevention, management and treatment. There is no single, direct and exclusive link between aggressiveness and the underlying psychiatric disorder. On the contrary, the processes underlying this violence are multiple and interlinked. In addition to static and dynamic risk factors, cognitive deficits play an important role in the genesis and maintenance of violent and aggressive behavior.

METHODS

Using recent data from the international literature and the main databases, we first clarify the role played by cognitive deficits in the violence of patients with schizophrenia. We then evaluate the place of psychosocial interventions such as cognitive remediation and social cognitive training in managing the violent and aggressive behavior of these patients.

RESULTS

Executive functions and working memory are the most studied neurocognitive functions in the field of violence in schizophrenia. Impulsivity, lack of cognitive flexibility, lack of adaptation and inhibition of automatic motor responses, and altered anger regulation may explain this relationship. Three main components of social cognition are associated with violent behaviors in schizophrenia: (1) the recognition of facial emotions through the inoperability of systems of "emotional monitoring", violent inhibition and recognition of informative facial zones; (2) the theory of the mind through the erroneous interpretation of the intentions of others; (3) the attributional style through the preferentially aggressive over interpretation of social situations and weak capacities of introspection. Overall, cognitive biases inhibit response in a socially acceptable manner and increase the risk of responding impulsively and aggressively to a stressful or provocative situation. In this context, we studied the place held by psychosocial interventions in the management of the violent and aggressive behaviors of these patients. Various cognitive remediation programs have shown their feasibility in people with schizophrenia and neurocognitive deficits with a history of violence as well as their effectiveness in reducing violence, mainly by reducing impulsivity. Similarly, specific programs dedicated to social cognitive training such as Social Cognition and Interaction Training (SCIT), Reasoning and Rehabilitation Mental Health Program (R&R2 MHP) and Metacognitive Training (MCT) have shown their positive impact on the control and reduction of global aggressive attitudes and on the numbers of physical and verbal aggressive incidents in schizophrenia. The improvement of social cognition would be achieved through the amendment of interpersonal relationships and social functioning. These interventions are effective at different stages of disease progression, in patients with varied profiles, on violent attitudes in general and on the number of verbal and physical attacks, whether for in-patients or out-patients. Beneficial effects can last up to 12months after termination of the study program. The interest of these interventions is preventive if the subject never entered in a violent register or curative in case of a personal history of violence. This type of care can be considered from a symptomatic point of view by limiting downstream the heavy consequences of such acts, but also etiologically by acting on one of the causes of violent behavior. Compliance with the eligibility criteria, carrying out a prior functional analysis and confirmation of the major impulsive part of the patient's violence are prerequisites for the use of these programs. Similarly, the early introduction of such therapies, their repetition over time and the integration of the patient into a comprehensive process of psychosocial rehabilitation will ensure the best chance of success.

CONCLUSIONS

Some cognitive impairments appear to have their place in the genesis, progression and maintenance of violent acts of individuals with schizophrenia. Their management thus opens new therapeutic perspectives such as cognitive remediation, still rarely used in this aim, to complement the action of the traditional care tools. However, further therapeutic trials are needed before considering cognitive remediation and social cognitive training as central care modalities in the therapeutic control of violence in schizophrenia.

摘要

目的

精神分裂症与暴力行为之间的关联是精神病学中的一个重要问题。暴力行为常常受到高度关注,引发了关于其检测、预防、管理和治疗的问题。攻击性与潜在精神障碍之间不存在单一、直接且排他的联系。相反,这种暴力行为背后的过程是多方面且相互关联的。除了静态和动态风险因素外,认知缺陷在暴力和攻击行为的发生及维持中起着重要作用。

方法

利用国际文献和主要数据库中的最新数据,我们首先阐明认知缺陷在精神分裂症患者暴力行为中所起的作用。然后我们评估心理社会干预措施,如认知矫正和社会认知训练,在管理这些患者暴力和攻击行为方面的地位。

结果

执行功能和工作记忆是精神分裂症暴力行为领域中研究最多的神经认知功能。冲动性、缺乏认知灵活性、缺乏适应性以及对自动运动反应的抑制能力改变,以及愤怒调节异常,可能解释了这种关系。社会认知的三个主要组成部分与精神分裂症中的暴力行为相关:(1)通过“情绪监测”系统功能失调、暴力抑制以及对面部信息区域的识别障碍来识别面部情绪;(2)通过对他人意图的错误解读体现心理理论;(3)通过对社会情境的过度攻击性解读以及内省能力薄弱体现归因风格。总体而言,认知偏差会抑制以社会可接受方式做出反应,并增加在面对压力或挑衅情境时冲动和攻击性反应的风险。在此背景下,我们研究了心理社会干预措施在管理这些患者暴力和攻击行为方面的地位。各种认知矫正项目已证明其在有暴力史的精神分裂症和神经认知缺陷患者中的可行性,以及在减少暴力行为方面的有效性,主要是通过降低冲动性来实现。同样,专门用于社会认知训练的特定项目,如社会认知与互动训练(SCIT)、推理与康复心理健康项目(R&R2 MHP)和元认知训练(MCT),已显示出它们对控制和减少精神分裂症患者整体攻击态度以及身体和言语攻击事件数量的积极影响。社会认知的改善将通过改善人际关系和社会功能来实现。这些干预措施在疾病进展的不同阶段、不同特征的患者中均有效,对一般暴力态度以及言语和身体攻击的数量均有效果,无论是住院患者还是门诊患者。在研究项目结束后,有益效果可持续长达12个月。如果个体从未有过暴力记录,这些干预措施具有预防作用;如果有暴力行为个人史,则具有治疗作用。从症状角度来看,这种类型的护理可以通过限制此类行为的下游严重后果来考虑,但也可以从病因学角度通过作用于暴力行为的一个原因来考虑。符合入选标准、进行预先功能分析以及确认患者暴力行为的主要冲动部分是使用这些项目的前提条件。同样,尽早引入此类疗法、随着时间重复进行以及将患者纳入全面的心理社会康复过程将确保获得最佳成功机会。

结论

一些认知障碍似乎在精神分裂症患者暴力行为的发生、进展和维持中占有一席之地。因此,对其进行管理开辟了新的治疗视角,如认知矫正(目前在这一目的上仍很少使用),以补充传统治疗手段的作用。然而,在将认知矫正和社会认知训练视为精神分裂症暴力行为治疗控制的核心治疗方式之前,还需要进一步的治疗试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验