Kevany Sebastian, Murima Oliver, Singh Basant, Hlubinka Daniel, Kulich Michal, Morin Stephen F, Sweat Michael
Institute for Global Health, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
J Public Health Afr. 2012 Mar 7;3(1):46-51. doi: 10.4081/jphia.2012.e13.
Zimbabwe's HIV epidemic is amongst the worst in the world, and disproportionately effects poorer rural areas. Access to almost all health services in Zimbabwe includes some form of cost to the client. In recent years, the socio-economic and employment status of many Zimbabweans has suffered a serious decline, creating additional barriers to HIV treatment and care. We aimed to assess the impact of i) socio-economic status (SES) and ii) employment status on the utilization of health services in rural Zimbabwe. Data were collected from a random probability sample household survey conducted in the Mutoko district of north-western Zimbabwe in 2005. We selected variables that described the economic status of the respondent, including: being paid to work, employment status, and SES by assets. Respondents were also asked about where they most often utilized healthcare when they or their family was sick or hurt. Of 2,874 respondents, all forms of healthcare tended to be utilized by those of high or medium-high SES (65%), including private (65%), church-based (61%), traditional (67%), and other providers (66%) (P=0.009). Most respondents of low SES utilized government providers (74%) (P=0.009). Seventy-one percent of respondents utilizing health services were employed. Government (71%), private (72%), church (71%), community-based (78%) and other (64%) health services tended to be utilized by employed respondents (P=0.000). Only traditional health services were equally utilized by unemployed respondents (50%) (P=0.000). A wide range of health providers are utilized in rural Zimbabwe. Utilization is strongly associated with SES and employment status, particularly for services with user fees, which may act as a barrier to HIV treatment and care access. Efforts to improve access in low-SES, high HIV-prevalence settings may benefit from the subsidization of the health care payment system, efforts to improve SES levels, political reform, and the involvement of traditional providers.
津巴布韦的艾滋病疫情在世界上最为严重,且对较贫困的农村地区影响尤为严重。在津巴布韦,几乎所有医疗服务都要求患者承担某种形式的费用。近年来,许多津巴布韦人的社会经济和就业状况严重下滑,这给艾滋病治疗和护理带来了更多障碍。我们旨在评估:i)社会经济地位(SES)和ii)就业状况对津巴布韦农村地区医疗服务利用情况的影响。数据来自2005年在津巴布韦西北部穆托科区进行的一项随机概率抽样家庭调查。我们选取了描述受访者经济状况的变量,包括:有工作报酬、就业状况以及基于资产的社会经济地位。受访者还被问及当他们或其家人患病或受伤时,最常在何处使用医疗服务。在2874名受访者中,社会经济地位高或中高的人群使用各类医疗服务的比例较高(65%),包括私立医疗机构(65%)、教会医疗机构(61%)、传统医疗机构(67%)以及其他医疗机构(66%)(P = 0.009)。社会经济地位低的受访者大多使用政府医疗机构(74%)(P = 0.009)。使用医疗服务的受访者中有71%有工作。有工作的受访者使用政府(71%)、私立(72%)、教会(71%)、社区(78%)和其他(64%)医疗机构的比例较高(P = 0.000)。只有传统医疗服务在失业受访者中的使用比例相同(50%)(P = 0.000)。在津巴布韦农村地区,人们使用多种医疗服务提供者。医疗服务的使用与社会经济地位和就业状况密切相关,尤其是对于收取用户费用的服务,这可能成为获得艾滋病治疗和护理的障碍。在社会经济地位低、艾滋病患病率高的地区,改善医疗服务可及性的努力可能受益于医疗支付系统补贴、提高社会经济地位的努力、政治改革以及传统医疗服务提供者的参与。