Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2012 Sep;49(3):391-403. doi: 10.1037/a0029371.
The concept of transference and the use of transference interpretations in psychotherapy have been highly controversial topics garnering frequent attention both within psychoanalysis and across multiple orientations of psychotherapy. In this article, we review the empirical evidence as it bears on this controversy and discuss the implications of the evidence for psychoanalysis, psychodynamic psychotherapy, and therapy in general. We provide a brief historical and contextual overview, followed by a discussion of the development of the concept of transference. We then discuss the evidence for the concept of transference from basic psychological research and contend that these findings are not only consistent with a social-cognitive and information processing model, but that they may also indicate conflict and defensive processes suggestive of a dynamic transference process model. We continue with a discussion of the evidence for the concept of transference from psychotherapy research and examine process findings relating to the use of transference interpretations and transference-focused psychotherapies. Finally, we present the implications of this emerging evidence for clinical practice.
转移的概念以及在心理治疗中使用转移解释一直是极具争议的话题,在精神分析内部以及多种心理治疗取向中都受到了频繁关注。在本文中,我们回顾了与这一争议相关的实证证据,并讨论了这些证据对精神分析、心理动力学心理治疗以及一般治疗的意义。我们提供了简短的历史和背景概述,接着讨论了转移概念的发展。然后,我们讨论了来自基础心理研究的转移概念的证据,并认为这些发现不仅与社会认知和信息处理模型一致,而且可能表明存在冲突和防御过程,暗示了动态转移过程模型。我们继续讨论来自心理治疗研究的转移概念的证据,并研究了与使用转移解释和转移焦点心理治疗相关的过程发现。最后,我们提出了这一新兴证据对临床实践的意义。