International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Old Naivasha Rd, Kabete, P.O. Box 30709-00100, Nairobi, Kenya.
Prev Vet Med. 2013 Feb 1;108(2-3):103-13. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.08.009. Epub 2012 Sep 8.
The primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus tick presence (exposure variable) on Theileria parva infection seroprevalence (outcome variable) in a group of cattle belonging to a farm using population attributable fractions (PAF). The analyses were based on a representative sample of 80 traditional smallholder mixed farms. The farms were selected by first stratifying the population administratively and implementing a multistage random sampling in Mbeere district in Kenya. The PAFs were estimated using the stratified, Bruzzi, and sequential partitioned PAF approaches. A secondary objective was, thus, to evaluate the impact of the approaches on the PAF estimates. The stratified and Bruzzi approaches estimated proportion of T. parva infection cases directly attributable to the exposure after controlling for confounding by agro-ecological zone (AEZ). The sequential partitioned PAF approach estimated a PAF associated with exposure after adjusting for any effect that the AEZ may have had by influencing the prevalence of the exposure. All analyses were carried out at the farm level where a farm was classified as infested if the tick was found on cattle on a farm, and infected if at least one animal on a farm was positive for T. parva antibodies. Variance estimation for PAFs was implemented using 'delete-a-group' jackknife re-sampling method. The stratified PAF (26.7% [95% CI: 9.0%, 44.4%]) and Bruzzi PAF (26.4% [95% CI: 9.6%, 43.2%]) were consistent in estimating a relatively low impact of farm vector tick presence with a relatively high level of uncertainty. The partitioned PAF (15.5% [95% CI: 1.5%, 29.6%]) suggested that part of the impacts estimated using the stratified PAF and Bruzzi approaches was driven by AEZ effects. Overall, the results suggested that under endemic instability in Mbeere district, (1) presence of R. appendiculatus was not a good indicator of T. parva infection occurrence on a farm; (2) ecological variation could play a role in determining infection impacts. This study provides a preliminary basis for evaluating the potential value and utility of estimating PAFs for variables amenable to control in tick-borne diseases (TBDs) epidemiological studies.
本研究的主要目的是评估在肯尼亚姆贝雷地区的一个农场中,以牛为对象,使用人群归因分数(PAF)评估残缘革蜱(Rhipicephalus appendiculatus)的存在(暴露变量)对小泰勒虫(Theileria parva)感染血清阳性率(结局变量)的影响。分析基于肯尼亚姆贝雷地区 80 个传统的小农户混合农场的代表性样本。首先通过行政分层和在肯尼亚姆贝雷地区实施多阶段随机抽样选择农场。使用分层、布鲁齐和连续分区 PAF 方法估计 PAF。次要目标是评估这些方法对 PAF 估计值的影响。分层和布鲁齐方法估计了在控制 agro-ecological zone(AEZ)混杂因素后,直接归因于暴露的小泰勒虫感染病例的比例。连续分区 PAF 方法估计了在调整 AEZ 可能通过影响暴露的流行率而产生的任何影响后与暴露相关的 PAF。所有分析均在农场水平上进行,即如果在农场的牛上发现蜱,则农场被归类为受感染;如果农场至少有一只动物对小泰勒虫抗体呈阳性,则农场被归类为感染。使用“删除一组”jackknife 重采样方法对 PAF 进行方差估计。分层 PAF(26.7%[95%CI:9.0%,44.4%])和布鲁齐 PAF(26.4%[95%CI:9.6%,43.2%])一致地估计了农场中向量蜱存在的相对低影响,但具有相对较高的不确定性。分区 PAF(15.5%[95%CI:1.5%,29.6%])表明,使用分层 PAF 和布鲁齐方法估计的部分影响是由 AEZ 效应驱动的。总体而言,结果表明在姆贝雷地区的地方流行不稳定的情况下,(1)残缘革蜱的存在不是农场小泰勒虫感染发生的良好指标;(2)生态变异可能在确定感染影响方面发挥作用。本研究为评估适用于蜱传疾病(TBD)流行病学研究的可控制变量的 PAF 估计值的潜在价值和效用提供了初步依据。