Wu Jie, Chen Min-hua, Yang Wei, Wu Wei, Yan Kun
Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Ultrasound, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing 100142, China.
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2012 Apr;20(4):256-60. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-3418.2012.04.006.
To retrospectively investigate the feasibility of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using standard ultrasound-guided percutaneous RFA.
A total of 655 patients with unresectable advanced HCC underwent ultrasound-guided percutaneous RFA therapy at our institution between July 2000 to September 2001. Ninety-two of those patients, representing 136 tumors, were selected for analysis based on the following criteria: presence of UICC/AJCC-TNM (6th edition) stage III and IV advanced HCC, (III: n=82 patients, with 126 tumors; IV: n=10 patients, with 10 tumors); extensive portal vein or inferior vena cava tumor thrombus; extrahepatic metastasis after surgical resection; and complete follow-up data. Follow-up consisted of enhanced computed tomography (CT) performed at one month post-RFA treatment, then every three months. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) was performed in 51 (55.4%) patients before RFA. The standard treatment using optimal strategies were applied in (72.8%) 67 patients. The established strategies included: (1) select RFA indications based on CEUS results; (2) design radical protocols based on invasive range showed by CEUS; (3) multiple overlapping ablations based on mathematical protocols; (4) two or three bipolar RFA electrodes with three-dimensional localization; (5) color ultrasound-guided percutaneous ablation of tumor feeding artery (PAA)/transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) + RFA for HCC with rich supply. The other 25 patients (27.2 %) were treated with conventional RFA protocols. The ablation procedure was considered a success if no abnormal enhancement or wash-out was detected in the treated area on the CT scan at one month. All patients had received liver protection treatments following RFA. Chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test were used to compare the early complete tumor necrosis rates and the local recurrence rates. Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test. P less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
The RFA-treated tumors ranged in size from 1.5 to 7.0 cm (average: 4.5 cm). Fifty-nine patients had solitary tumor, and the remaining 33 had multiple tumors (2 to 4 tumors). Patients were classified by Child-Pugh score as A (n=58), B (n=32) and C (n=2). Early complete tumor necrosis rate after initial RFA was 90.4% (123/136 tumors). Serious complications developed in two patients (2.2%). No treatment-related death occurred. Follow-up ranged from 3-134 months. Local recurrence rate was 16.9% (23/136 tumors). The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 83.3%, 48.3% and 21.9%, respectively, and the median survival time was 35 months. Stratification analysis indicated the early complete tumor necrosis rate was higher in groups of patients with Child-Pugh A score (98.3%) , CEUS administration (98.0%), and standard treatment (97.0%). The local recurrence rate was lower in groups of patients with tumors less than or equal to 3.0 cm (5.9%), CEUS administration (11.8%), and standard treatment (16.4%). The 5-year survival was significantly higher in patients with Child-Pugh A, tumors less than or equal to 3.0 cm, CEUS administration, and standard treatment (all, P less than 0.05).
RFA treatment of patients with advanced HCC, tumors less than 7.0 cm, and without thrombosis in the main vessels was efficacious. The RFA treatment strategy and subsequent liver protection therapy in RFA may improve survival.
回顾性研究采用标准超声引导下经皮射频消融术(RFA)治疗晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)的可行性。
2000年7月至2001年9月期间,共有655例无法切除的晚期HCC患者在我院接受了超声引导下经皮RFA治疗。根据以下标准选择其中92例患者(共136个肿瘤)进行分析:国际抗癌联盟(UICC)/美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)-TNM(第6版)III期和IV期晚期HCC(III期:n = 82例患者,126个肿瘤;IV期:n = 10例患者,10个肿瘤);广泛门静脉或下腔静脉肿瘤血栓形成;手术切除后肝外转移;以及完整的随访数据。随访包括RFA治疗后1个月进行的增强计算机断层扫描(CT),之后每3个月进行一次。51例(55.4%)患者在RFA前进行了对比增强超声(CEUS)检查。67例(72.8%)患者采用了基于最佳策略的标准治疗方法。既定策略包括:(1)根据CEUS结果选择RFA适应证;(2)根据CEUS显示的侵袭范围设计根治性方案;(3)基于数学方案进行多次重叠消融;(4)使用两到三个三维定位的双极RFA电极;(5)彩色超声引导下经皮肿瘤供血动脉消融(PAA)/经导管动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)+ RFA治疗血供丰富的HCC。另外25例(27.2%)患者采用传统RFA方案治疗。如果在1个月时的CT扫描中治疗区域未检测到异常强化或廓清,则认为消融手术成功。所有患者在RFA后均接受了肝脏保护治疗。采用卡方检验或Fisher精确检验比较早期肿瘤完全坏死率和局部复发率。采用Kaplan-Meier分析和对数秩检验评估生存率。P < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
RFA治疗的肿瘤大小范围为1.5至7.0 cm(平均:4.5 cm)。59例患者为单发肿瘤,其余33例为多发肿瘤(2至4个肿瘤)。根据Child-Pugh评分将患者分为A组(n = (此处原文有误,推测应为58))、B组(n = 32)和C组(n = 2)。初次RFA后的早期肿瘤完全坏死率为90.4%(123/136个肿瘤)。2例患者(2.2%)发生严重并发症。未发生与治疗相关的死亡。随访时间为3至134个月。局部复发率为16.9%(23/136个肿瘤)。1年、3年和5年总生存率分别为83.3%、48.3%和21.9%,中位生存时间为35个月。分层分析表明,Child-Pugh A评分组(98.3%)、接受CEUS检查组(98.0%)和接受标准治疗组((此处原文有误,推测应为97.0%))的早期肿瘤完全坏死率较高。肿瘤直径小于或等于3.0 cm组(5.9%)、接受CEUS检查组(11.8%)和接受标准治疗组(16.4%)的局部复发率较低。Child-Pugh A级、肿瘤直径小于或等于3.0 cm、接受CEUS检查和接受标准治疗的患者5年生存率显著更高(均P < 0.05)。
RFA治疗肿瘤直径小于7.0 cm且主血管无血栓形成的晚期HCC患者有效。RFA治疗策略及后续的肝脏保护治疗可能会提高生存率。