文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

[Comparison of safety and efficacy for transcatheter arterial chemoembolization alone and plus radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of single branch portal vein tumor thrombus of hepatocellular carcinoma and their prognosis factors].

作者信息

Zhao Ming, Wang Jian-peng, Li Wang, Huang Zi-lin, Zhang Fu-jun, Fan Wei-jun, Zhang Liang, Li Xi-shan, Pan Chang-chuan, Wu Pei-hong

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China; Minimally Invasive & Interventional Department, Cancer Center, SUN Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011 May 10;91(17):1167-72.


DOI:
PMID:21756768
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone or plus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in the treatment of single branch portal vein tumor thrombus(PVTT)in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) so as to evaluate the safety, control rate, prognostic factors and overall survival. METHODS: From January 2004 to December 2007, 50 HCC patients (< 5 cm in diameter and 3 parenchymal lesions) with concurrent PVTT were enrolled and treated by TACE alone or TACE plus RFA randomly (TACE, n = 25; TACE-RFA, n = 25). In TACE group, the intra-hepatic lesions received TACE sequentially with RFA; in TACE-RFA group, PVTT and intra-hepatic lesions were treated with TACE sequentially with RFA separately. Strict follow-up was conducted by computed tomography and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) assay. The survival time was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic factors. RESULTS: Of all 50 HCC patients with single branch PVTT with TACE or RFA, 47 patients (TACE, n = 24; TACE-RFA, n = 23) received all the scheduled procedures and completed the follow-up. Two patients (8.3%) in TACE group had liver dysfunction versus none in TACE-RFA group, 2 patients (8.7%) developed bile duct injury in TACE-RFA group related with the RFA procedure. The OR (overall response) for PVTT was 54.2% (complete response (CR) 8.3%, partial response (PR) 45.8%) in TACE group while 87.0% (CR 60.9%, PR 26.1%) in TACE-RFA group during the follow-up. From the definite diagnosis of HCC, the median survival was 8 months. And the 1-, 2- & 3-year survival rates were 33.3%, 12.5%, 8.3% in TACE group. And 26 months, 65.2%, 47.8%, 30.4% in TACE-RFA group respectively. The difference between two groups was significant. From the definite diagnosis of PVTT, the respective data were 7 months, 12.5% and 4.2%, 0 in TACE group versus 22 months, 52.2%, 34.8%, and 8.7% in TACE-RFA group with a significant P value. In multivariate analysis, only therapy (TACE or TACE-RFA) showed a protective value (hazard rate 0.430 vs 0.345, P < 0.05). Survival was not correlated with age, intra-hepatic tumor status, liver functions and AFP level for all patients. CONCLUSION: RFA is both safe and efficacious to prolong survival in the treatment of single branch PVTT plus TACE in selected HCC patients. It may provide rationales for further studies of evaluating the outcome of RFA plus other therapies in the treatment of HCC with single branch PVTT.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索