Emory University School of Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2012 Nov;18(6):596-601. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e328358d533.
Benchmarking involves the ascertainment of healthcare programs with most favorable outcomes as a means to identify and spread effective strategies for delivery of care. The recent interest in the development of patient registries for patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) has been fueled in part by an interest in using them to facilitate benchmarking. This review summarizes reports of how benchmarking has been operationalized in attempts to improve CF care.
Although certain goals of benchmarking can be accomplished with an exclusive focus on registry data analysis, benchmarking programs in Germany and the United States have supplemented these data analyses with exploratory interactions and discussions to better understand successful approaches to care and encourage their spread throughout the care network.
Benchmarking allows the discovery and facilitates the spread of effective approaches to care. It provides a pragmatic alternative to traditional research methods such as randomized controlled trials, providing insights into methods that optimize delivery of care and allowing judgments about the relative effectiveness of different therapeutic approaches.
基准化涉及确定具有最佳结果的医疗保健计划,以此作为确定和推广有效护理提供策略的手段。最近人们对开发囊性纤维化 (CF) 患者的患者登记处产生了兴趣,部分原因是希望利用它们来促进基准化。本综述总结了报告基准化如何运作以改善 CF 护理的情况。
尽管可以通过专门关注登记处数据分析来实现基准化的某些目标,但德国和美国的基准化计划通过探索性互动和讨论来补充这些数据分析,以更好地了解成功的护理方法并鼓励其在整个护理网络中传播。
基准化允许发现并促进有效的护理方法的传播。它为随机对照试验等传统研究方法提供了一种实用的替代方案,为优化护理提供方法提供了深入的了解,并允许对不同治疗方法的相对有效性进行判断。