• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用囊性纤维化患者登记处评估结果并改善德国的囊性纤维化护理。

The use of a cystic fibrosis patient registry to assess outcomes and improve cystic fibrosis care in Germany.

机构信息

Department of General Paediatrics, Haematology, Oncology, University Children's Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.

出版信息

Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2011 Nov;17(6):473-7. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32834b6b72.

DOI:10.1097/MCP.0b013e32834b6b72
PMID:21881513
Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cystic fibrosis (CF) patient registries have become an important epidemiological tool for demography, networking, and quality management. This review describes recent developments in patient registries, outcome research, and pilot projects in quality improvement.

RECENT FINDINGS

National and international CF registry efforts have been producing consolidated data. Classical outcome indicators describing nutritional status and lung function are now being used in a more precise way, based on body mass index percentiles and longitudinal data. Projects involving single centers and quality groups, such as the German benchmarking project, have been showing that quality improvement is possible and that negative developments do not necessarily have to be accepted in CF.

SUMMARY

CF provides a model of the link between healthcare delivery and outcomes in patients. CF registry data can be used to improve quality in CF healthcare. Quality improvement is a continuous endeavor involving the reinforcement of standards and programs as well as individual attitudes and soft skills. One particularly powerful technique is benchmarking, that is, learning from the best.

摘要

目的综述

囊性纤维化 (CF) 患者登记处已成为人口统计学、网络和质量管理的重要流行病学工具。本综述描述了患者登记处、结果研究和质量改进试点项目的最新进展。

最近的发现

国家和国际 CF 登记处的工作一直在产生综合数据。基于体重指数百分位数和纵向数据,现在正在更精确地使用描述营养状况和肺功能的经典结果指标。涉及单个中心和质量小组的项目,如德国基准项目,已经表明质量改进是可能的,CF 中不一定必须接受负面发展。

总结

CF 提供了医疗保健提供与患者结果之间联系的模型。CF 登记处数据可用于改善 CF 医疗保健质量。质量改进是一项持续的努力,涉及加强标准和计划以及个人态度和软技能。一个特别强大的技术是基准测试,即从最好的学习。

相似文献

1
The use of a cystic fibrosis patient registry to assess outcomes and improve cystic fibrosis care in Germany.利用囊性纤维化患者登记处评估结果并改善德国的囊性纤维化护理。
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2011 Nov;17(6):473-7. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e32834b6b72.
2
Benchmarking to improve the quality of cystic fibrosis care.基准测试以提高囊性纤维化护理质量。
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2012 Nov;18(6):596-601. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e328358d533.
3
Benchmarking improves quality in cystic fibrosis care: a pilot project involving 12 centres.基准测试可提高囊性纤维化护理质量:涉及 12 个中心的试点项目。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2011 Jun;23(3):349-56. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr017. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
4
Improving the quality of care for patients with cystic fibrosis.提高囊性纤维化患者的护理质量。
Curr Opin Pediatr. 2010 Jun;22(3):296-301. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e328339550e.
5
[Benchmarking to evaluate the care of patients with cystic fibrosis: an established tool to improve patient care].[通过基准评估来评价囊性纤维化患者的护理:一种改善患者护理的既定工具]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(5):354-9. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.05.012. Epub 2011 Jun 16.
6
Improving care at cystic fibrosis centers through quality improvement.通过质量改进提升囊性纤维化中心的护理水平。
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Oct;30(5):547-58. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1238913. Epub 2009 Sep 16.
7
Cystic fibrosis care in Chile.智利囊性纤维化护理。
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2009 Nov;15(6):632-7. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0b013e328330db7a.
8
Key findings of the US Cystic Fibrosis Foundation's clinical practice benchmarking project.美国囊性纤维化基金会临床实践基准项目的主要发现。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Apr;23 Suppl 1:i15-i22. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002369.
9
A story of success: continuous quality improvement in cystic fibrosis care in the USA.一个成功的故事:美国囊性纤维化护理的持续质量改进。
Thorax. 2011 Dec;66(12):1106-8. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-200611. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
10
From registry to quality management: the German Cystic Fibrosis Quality Assessment project 1995 2006.从登记到质量管理:1995 - 2006年德国囊性纤维化质量评估项目
Eur Respir J. 2008 Jan;31(1):29-35. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00056507. Epub 2007 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the utilisation and effectiveness of implementation science strategies by cystic fibrosis registries for healthcare improvement: a systematic review.探索囊性纤维化登记处利用实施科学策略改善医疗保健的情况及效果:一项系统评价。
Eur Respir Rev. 2025 Apr 16;34(176). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0227-2024. Print 2025 Apr.
2
Success of the German Cystic Fibrosis Registry.德国囊性纤维化登记处的成功。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2025 Jan;34(1):e70076. doi: 10.1002/pds.70076.
3
Assessment of activities and participation of people by rehabilitation-focused clinical registries: a systematic scoping review.
康复为导向的临床登记处对个人活动和参与的评估:系统范围界定综述。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Oct;59(5):640-652. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07895-4. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
4
Posttraumatic stress symptoms in adolescents and young adults with a chronic somatic disease: a mixed-methods study.患有慢性躯体疾病的青少年和青年的创伤后应激症状:一项混合方法研究。
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2023 Jun 26;17(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13034-023-00630-x.
5
Sustained Reduction in Time to Data Entry in the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Registry.囊性纤维化基金会登记处数据录入时间的持续缩短。
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2022 Jan 21;7(1):e529. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000529. eCollection 2022 Jan-Feb.
6
A prospective investigation of developmental trajectories of psychosocial adjustment in adolescents facing a chronic condition - study protocol of an observational, multi-center study.一项前瞻性研究:青少年慢性疾病相关的心理社会适应发展轨迹-一项观察性、多中心研究的研究方案。
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Sep 14;21(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02869-9.
7
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of guided Internet- and mobile-based CBT for adolescents and young adults with chronic somatic conditions and comorbid depression and anxiety symptoms (youthCOACH): study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial.基于互联网和移动的认知行为疗法对慢性躯体疾病合并抑郁和焦虑症状的青少年和年轻成人的有效性和成本效益研究(youthCOACH):一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Mar 12;21(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-4041-9.