• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移植物质量对非紧急肝再移植存活的影响:我们是否应该避免高危供体?

Effects of graft quality on non-urgent liver retransplantation survival: should we avoid high-risk donors?

机构信息

Liver Surgery and Transplantation Unit, Institut de Malalties Digestives i Metabòliques, IDIBAPS, Hospital Clínic i Provincial, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Villarroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2012 Dec;36(12):2914-22. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1757-z.

DOI:10.1007/s00268-012-1757-z
PMID:22968536
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Few studies have studied the effects of graft quality on non-urgent liver retransplantation (ReLT) outcomes. We aimed to analyze graft characteristics and survival in non-urgent ReLT and the effect of using grafts with extended criteria on survival.

METHODS

Eighty non-urgent ReLT were performed from June 1988 to June 2010. The whole series was divided by identical time periods to study time-related effects. We assessed graft quality with donor risk index (DRI) and Briceño scores and recipient status with the Model for End-stage Liver Diseases and Rosen scores. Low and high-risk grafts were defined by a DRI cutoff of 1.8.

RESULTS

Graft survival was similar in both periods (1-, 5-, and 10-year graft survivals: 73.5, 46.9, and 40.8 versus 71, 47.7, and 47.7%, p=0.935) although donor quality was worse in the second period (DRI: 1.35±0.32 vs. 1.66±0.34, p<0.001). In the first period high-risk grafts did worse than low-risk grafts (5-year survival: 0 vs. 54.5%, p=0.002) while in the second period outcomes were similar (5-year survival: 48.6 vs. 56.7%, p=0.660). Donor age was the only independent donor factor for graft survival, with lower survival when using grafts from donors over 60-years-old.

CONCLUSIONS

Graft quality in ReLT has worsened with time mainly because of older donors but nowadays the use of high-risk grafts in non-urgent ReLT is not associated with worse graft survival because of better perioperative management. Moreover of being selective on recipient conditions, care should be taken when using grafts from donors over 60-years-old for non-urgent ReLT.

摘要

背景

很少有研究探讨供肝质量对非紧急肝再移植(ReLT)结局的影响。本研究旨在分析非紧急 ReLT 中的供肝特征和存活率,以及使用扩展标准供肝对存活率的影响。

方法

1988 年 6 月至 2010 年 6 月期间,进行了 80 例非紧急 ReLT。将整个系列按相同时间段分为两部分,以研究时间相关的影响。我们使用供体风险指数(DRI)和 Briceño 评分评估供肝质量,使用终末期肝病模型(MELD)和 Rosen 评分评估受体状态。低危和高危供肝的定义为 DRI 截断值为 1.8。

结果

尽管在第二个时间段供体质量较差(DRI:1.35±0.32 对 1.66±0.34,p<0.001),但两个时间段的移植物存活率相似(1、5 和 10 年移植物存活率:73.5、46.9 和 40.8 对 71、47.7 和 47.7%,p=0.935)。在第一个时间段,高危供肝的存活率低于低危供肝(5 年存活率:0 对 54.5%,p=0.002),而在第二个时间段,结果相似(5 年存活率:48.6 对 56.7%,p=0.660)。供体年龄是影响移植物存活率的唯一独立供体因素,使用 60 岁以上供体的移植物存活率较低。

结论

随着时间的推移,ReLT 中的供肝质量有所恶化,主要是由于老年供体增多,但如今,在非紧急 ReLT 中使用高危供肝并不与移植物存活率降低相关,这得益于更好的围手术期管理。此外,在选择受体条件时,对于非紧急 ReLT,应谨慎使用 60 岁以上供体的移植物。

相似文献

1
Effects of graft quality on non-urgent liver retransplantation survival: should we avoid high-risk donors?移植物质量对非紧急肝再移植存活的影响:我们是否应该避免高危供体?
World J Surg. 2012 Dec;36(12):2914-22. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1757-z.
2
Predictive factors for survival and score application in liver retransplantation for hepatitis C recurrence.丙型肝炎复发肝再次移植生存的预测因素及评分应用
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 May 14;22(18):4547-58. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i18.4547.
3
Optimizing repeat liver transplant graft utility through strategic matching of donor and recipient characteristics.通过供体和受体特征的策略性匹配优化再次肝移植移植物的效用。
Liver Transpl. 2015 Nov;21(11):1365-73. doi: 10.1002/lt.24138.
4
Optimization of liver grafts in liver retransplantation: a European single-center experience.肝再次移植中肝脏移植物的优化:一项欧洲单中心经验
Surgery. 2008 Nov;144(5):762-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.06.029. Epub 2008 Sep 3.
5
Graft and viral outcomes in retransplantation for hepatitis C virus recurrence and HCV primary liver transplantation: a case-control study.丙型肝炎病毒复发再移植及 HCV 原发性肝移植中的移植物和病毒转归:一项病例对照研究
Clin Transplant. 2014 Jul;28(7):821-8. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12385. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
6
Survival benefit of repeat liver transplantation in the United States: a serial MELD analysis by hepatitis C status and donor risk index.美国再次肝移植的生存获益:基于丙型肝炎状态和供体风险指数的连续终末期肝病模型分析
Am J Transplant. 2014 Nov;14(11):2588-94. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12867. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
7
Selected liver grafts from donation after circulatory death can be safely used for retransplantation - a multicenter retrospective study.从循环死亡供体中选择的肝脏移植物可安全用于再次移植——一项多中心回顾性研究。
Transpl Int. 2020 Jun;33(6):667-674. doi: 10.1111/tri.13596. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
8
Donor characteristics that are associated with survival in liver transplant recipients older than 70 years with grafts.与接受肝脏移植且年龄超过70岁的受者存活相关的供体特征。
Transplant Proc. 2013;45(10):3633-6. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.10.031.
9
Donor Age Still Matters in Liver Transplant: Results From the United Network for Organ Sharing-Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients Database.供体年龄在肝移植中仍然至关重要:来自器官共享联合网络-移植受者科学注册数据库的结果
Exp Clin Transplant. 2017 Oct;15(5):536-541. doi: 10.6002/ect.2016.0011. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
10
Predictive index for long-term survival after retransplantation of the liver in adult recipients: analysis of a 26-year experience in a single center.成人肝移植后长期生存的预测指标:单中心 26 年经验分析。
Ann Surg. 2011 Sep;254(3):444-8; discussion 448-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31822c5878.

引用本文的文献

1
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma presenting as acute adrenal hemorrhage.以急性肾上腺出血为表现的弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤
Blood Res. 2025 Mar 19;60(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s44313-025-00064-8.
2
Effects of Donor Age and Cold Ischemia on Liver Transplantation Outcomes According to the Severity of Recipient Status.根据受体状态严重程度,供体年龄和冷缺血对肝移植结局的影响。
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Feb;61(2):626-35. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3910-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimization of liver grafts in liver retransplantation: a European single-center experience.肝再次移植中肝脏移植物的优化:一项欧洲单中心经验
Surgery. 2008 Nov;144(5):762-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.06.029. Epub 2008 Sep 3.
2
Donor factors predicting recipient survival after liver retransplantation: the retransplant donor risk index.预测肝再次移植后受者生存的供体因素:再次移植供体风险指数
Am J Transplant. 2007 Aug;7(8):1984-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01887.x.
3
Changing faces of liver retransplantation: it is all about selection.
Liver Transpl. 2007 Feb;13(2):188-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.21020.
4
Use of extended criteria livers decreases wait time for liver transplantation without adversely impacting posttransplant survival.使用扩大标准供肝可减少肝移植等待时间,且不会对移植后生存率产生不利影响。
Ann Surg. 2006 Sep;244(3):439-50. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000234896.18207.fa.
5
Characteristics associated with liver graft failure: the concept of a donor risk index.与肝移植失败相关的特征:供体风险指数的概念
Am J Transplant. 2006 Apr;6(4):783-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01242.x.
6
One thousand liver transplants: the hospital clinic experience.
Transplant Proc. 2005 Nov;37(9):3916-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.09.167.
7
When shouldn't we retransplant?我们什么时候不应该进行再次移植?
Liver Transpl. 2005 Nov(11 Suppl 2):S14-20. doi: 10.1002/lt.20599.
8
[Hepatic retransplantation].
Med Clin (Barc). 2005 May 21;124(19):733-4. doi: 10.1157/13075445.
9
Is retransplantation an option for recurrent hepatitis C cirrhosis after liver transplantation?
J Hepatol. 2005 Apr;42(4):468-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.01.014.
10
Validation and refinement of survival models for liver retransplantation.肝再次移植生存模型的验证与完善
Hepatology. 2003 Aug;38(2):460-9. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50328.