• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腭部种植体与颧骨板锚固用于上颌后牙远移。

Palatal implant versus zygoma plate anchorage for distalization of maxillary posterior teeth.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur J Orthod. 2013 Aug;35(4):507-14. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs059. Epub 2012 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1093/ejo/cjs059
PMID:22968670
Abstract

This study aimed to examine the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects of the implant-supported pendulum (ISP) and the zygoma anchorage system (ZAS) used for the distalization of maxillary posterior teeth. Among 30 patients showing Angle class II malocclusion, 15 patients with a mean age of 14.3±1.6 years and treated with ISP were included in the first group; 15 patients with a mean age of 14.7±2.5 years and treated with ZAS were included in the second group. The predistalization and postdistalization lateral cephalograms were analysed. Statistical evaluation was carried out using SPSS. Point A and upper incisors protruded in the ISP group, retruded in the ZAS group. Upper posterior teeth were distalized in both groups, but more in the ZAS group. Significant differences were observed between the groups for the sagittal movements of Point A, incisors, and posterior teeth. Overbite decreased in the ISP group, overjet decreased in the ZAS group, upper and lower lips retruded only in the ZAS group. Both methods provided absolute anchorage for distalization of posterior teeth, but the skeletal and soft tissue outcome and distalization obtained was greater in the ZAS group. Both methods can be used as alternatives to extraoral traction and conventional molar distalization appliances with different patient requirements.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨种植体支抗的 Pendulum(ISP)和颧骨支抗系统(ZAS)用于上颌后牙远移的骨骼、牙齿和软组织效果。在 30 名表现为安氏 II 类错牙合的患者中,15 名年龄为 14.3±1.6 岁的患者被纳入第一组,接受 ISP 治疗;15 名年龄为 14.7±2.5 岁的患者被纳入第二组,接受 ZAS 治疗。分析了预远移和远移后的侧位头颅侧位片。使用 SPSS 进行统计评估。在 ISP 组中,A 点和上颌切牙突出,在 ZAS 组中后退。两组上颌后牙均远移,但 ZAS 组远移更多。A 点、切牙和后牙的矢状运动在两组之间存在显著差异。在 ISP 组中,覆颌减少,在 ZAS 组中,覆盖减少,只有在 ZAS 组中,上、下唇后退。两种方法均为后牙远移提供了绝对支抗,但 ZAS 组获得的骨骼和软组织效果以及远移量更大。两种方法均可替代口外牵引和传统的磨牙远移装置,以满足不同患者的需求。

相似文献

1
Palatal implant versus zygoma plate anchorage for distalization of maxillary posterior teeth.腭部种植体与颧骨板锚固用于上颌后牙远移。
Eur J Orthod. 2013 Aug;35(4):507-14. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjs059. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
2
Comparison of the zygoma anchorage system with cervical headgear in buccal segment distalization.颧骨锚固系统与口外弓在颊侧段远中移动中的比较。
Eur J Orthod. 2009 Aug;31(4):417-24. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp016. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
3
Unilateral maxillary molar distalization with zygoma-gear appliance.用颧骨齿轮装置远移上颌单侧磨牙。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Aug;142(2):e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.02.026.
4
The effectiveness of pendulum, K-loop, and distal jet distalization techniques in growing children and its effects on anchor unit: A comparative study.钟摆式、K环和远中喷射远中移动技术在儿童生长发育中的有效性及其对支抗单位的影响:一项比较研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2016 Oct-Dec;34(4):331-40. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.191411.
5
Effects of maxillary molar distalization with Zygoma-Gear Appliance.上颌磨牙远移的 Zygoma-Gear 矫治器的作用。
Angle Orthod. 2012 Jul;82(4):596-602. doi: 10.2319/091611-595.1. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
6
Retrospective comparison of two different miniscrew-supported molar distalization methods applied in the buccal and palatal regions.颊腭侧两种不同微螺钉支抗磨牙远移方法的回顾性比较。
J World Fed Orthod. 2024 Jun;13(3):145-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.01.006. Epub 2024 Mar 23.
7
Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance.使用骨锚式摆式矫治器远移上颌磨牙
Angle Orthod. 2006 Jul;76(4):650-9. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(2006)076[0650:MMDWAB]2.0.CO;2.
8
Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.上颌前突牙列治疗效果的三维牙科模型分析:头帽、微螺钉和微型钛板骨锚固的比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Nov;134(5):636-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.017.
9
Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.传统支抗磨牙远移治疗在生长发育中 II 类非患者中的软组织、骨骼和牙牙槽变化:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Prog Orthod. 2012 May;13(1):30-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pio.2011.07.002. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
10
Comparison of two implant-supported molar distalization systems.两种种植体支抗磨牙远移系统的比较。
Angle Orthod. 2013 May;83(3):460-7. doi: 10.2319/080512-630.1. Epub 2012 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the efficacy of conventional, skeletal and invisible orthodontic appliance for upper molar distalization in Class II Malocclusion patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.传统、骨骼和隐形正畸矫治器对Ⅱ类错颌患者上颌磨牙远移疗效的分析:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Sep 2;25(1):1396. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06378-4.
2
Total mesialization of the mandibular dentition using a mini-implant-supported device : A finite element analysis.使用微型种植体支抗装置实现下颌牙列整体向近中移动:一项有限元分析。
J Orofac Orthop. 2024 Aug;85(Suppl 2):145-154. doi: 10.1007/s00056-023-00502-1. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
3
Evaluation of the effects of the hybrid Pendulum in comparison with the conventional Pendulum appliance.
评价混合摆与传统摆式矫治器的疗效比较。
Angle Orthod. 2020 Mar;90(2):194-201. doi: 10.2319/051719-340.1. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
4
Evaluation of Dentoalveolar and Dentofacial Effects of a Mini-Screw-Anchored Pendulum Appliance in Maxillary Molar Distalization.微型螺钉锚定摆式矫治器对上颌磨牙远移的牙槽骨及牙面效果评估
Turk J Orthod. 2018 Dec;31(4):103-109. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.18004. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
5
Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年上前牙突出(安氏II类错牙合)的正畸治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 13;3(3):CD003452. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003452.pub4.
6
Changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the bone-anchored pendulum appliance.使用骨锚式摆锤矫治器远移上颌磨牙后的变化
J Orthod Sci. 2017 Oct-Dec;6(4):141-146. doi: 10.4103/jos.JOS_66_17.
7
A three-dimensional finite element analysis of molar distalization with a palatal plate, pendulum, and headgear according to molar eruption stage.根据磨牙萌出阶段,对上颌腭板、摆锤式矫治器和头帽推磨牙远移进行三维有限元分析。
Korean J Orthod. 2016 Sep;46(5):290-300. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2016.46.5.290. Epub 2016 Sep 19.