Benson Amanda Andrews, Bobo Linda S, Green Michael S
Department of Athletic Training, Troy University, 3212 Veterans Stadium Dr., Troy, AL 36082, USA.
J Allied Health. 2012 Fall;41(3):118-22.
Maintaining consistency and fairness when grading in a clinical setting can be difficult with the best method of clinical evaluation remaining unclear. Therefore, it is important to develop methods to ensure that instructors are scoring their students fairly within professional allied health programs.
The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of scoring students in real-time compared to video.
Subjects consisted of 27 students enrolled in an allied health professional program. Students were taught a psychomotor clinical skill (PCS) and subsequently performed the skill while being graded in both real-time and videotape.
Investigators provided higher scores when assessing students in real-time versus videotaped evaluation (p = 0.006, 1-b = 0.812). There was a trend (p = 0.074; 1-b = 0.514) toward students' classification (sophomore, junior, or graduate) affecting scoring accuracy.
These findings indicate students receive higher performance scores during real-time scoring as opposed to videotape scoring. Inaccurate PCS evaluations are perhaps especially noted in students from lower academic classifications who tended to make more mistakes.
在临床环境中进行评分时，要保持一致性和公平性可能很困难，因为最佳的临床评估方法仍不明确。因此，开发方法以确保教师在专业联合健康项目中公正地给学生打分很重要。
本研究的目的是确定与视频相比实时给学生评分的准确性。
受试者包括27名参加联合健康专业项目的学生。学生们学习了一项心理运动临床技能（PCS），随后在实时评分和录像评分的同时进行该技能操作。
与录像评估相比，研究人员在实时评估学生时给出的分数更高（p = 0.006，1 - b = 0.812）。学生的分类（大二、大三或研究生）对评分准确性有影响的趋势（p = 0.074；1 - b = 0.514）。
这些发现表明，与录像评分相比，学生在实时评分中获得的表现分数更高。PCS评估不准确可能在学术分类较低、往往犯错更多的学生中尤为明显。
