Post-publication peer review: opening up scientific conversation.
作者信息
Hunter Jane
机构信息
Faculty of 1000, Ltd. London, UK.
出版信息
Front Comput Neurosci. 2012 Aug 30;6:63. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2012.00063. eCollection 2012.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Post-publication peer review: opening up scientific conversation.发表后同行评审：开启科学对话。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2012 Aug 30;6:63. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2012.00063. eCollection 2012.
2
Evaluating alternative systems of peer review: a large-scale agent-based modelling approach to scientific publication.评估同行评审的替代系统：一种基于主体建模的科学出版大规模方法。
Scientometrics. 2017;113(1):651-671. doi: 10.1007/s11192-017-2375-1. Epub 2017 Apr 3.
3
Researcher perspectives on publication and peer review of data.研究人员对数据发表和同行评审的看法。
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 23;10(2):e0117619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117619. eCollection 2015.
4
Complex systems approach to scientific publication and peer-review system: development of an agent-based model calibrated with empirical journal data.科学出版与同行评审系统的复杂系统方法：基于实证期刊数据校准的基于主体模型的开发。
Scientometrics. 2016;106:695-715. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1800-6. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
5
Post-publication Peer Review with an Intention to Uncover Data/Result Irregularities and Potential Research Misconduct in Scientific Research: Vigilantism or Volunteerism?发表后同行评议旨在发现科学研究中的数据/结果异常和潜在的研究不端行为：是警戒主义还是志愿主义？
Sci Eng Ethics. 2023 Jun 28;29(4):24. doi: 10.1007/s11948-023-00447-z.
6
Publication of presented abstracts at annual scientific meetings: a measure of quality?在年度科学会议上发表所展示的摘要：是一种质量衡量标准吗？
Vet Hum Toxicol. 1990 Oct;32(5):470-2.
7
Multi-stage open peer review: scientific evaluation integrating the strengths of traditional peer review with the virtues of transparency and self-regulation.多阶段公开同行评审：将传统同行评审的优势与透明度和自我监管的优点相结合的科学评估。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2012 Jul 5;6:33. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2012.00033. eCollection 2012.
8
'Peer review' for scientific manuscripts: Emerging issues, potential threats, and possible remedies.科学手稿的“同行评审”：新出现的问题、潜在威胁及可能的补救措施。
Med J Armed Forces India. 2016 Apr;72(2):172-4. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.02.014. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
9
Open evaluation: a vision for entirely transparent post-publication peer review and rating for science.公开评估：对科学进行完全透明的发表后同行评审和评级的愿景。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2012 Oct 17;6:79. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2012.00079. eCollection 2012.
10
Peer Review and Scientific Publication at a Crossroads: Call for Research for the 10th International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication.同行评审与科学出版处于十字路口：呼吁为第十届国际同行评审与科学出版大会开展研究
JAMA. 2023 Oct 3;330(13):1232-1235. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.17607.
引用本文的文献
1
"Non-Markovian" and "directional" errors inhibit scientific self-correction and can lead fields of study astray: an illustration using gardening and obesity-related outcomes.“非马尔可夫性”和“方向性”错误会阻碍科学的自我修正，并可能使研究领域误入歧途：以园艺和肥胖相关结果为例进行说明。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 May 24;25(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02590-6.
2
Using AI to enhance scientific discourse by transforming journals into learning communities.通过将期刊转变为学习社区，利用人工智能提升科学交流。
Arch Physiother. 2025 May 5;15:90-96. doi: 10.33393/aop.2025.3442. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Post-publication peer review and the identification of methodological and reporting issues in COVID-19 trials: a qualitative study.发表后同行评审与新冠病毒疾病试验中方法学和报告问题的识别：一项定性研究
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2025 Jul 21;30(4):233-240. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2024-113068.
4
How to improve scientific peer review: Four schools of thought.如何改进科学同行评审：四种思想流派。
Learn Publ. 2023 Jul;36(3):334-347. doi: 10.1002/leap.1544. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
5
Improving reproducibility and reusability in the Journal of Cheminformatics.提高《化学信息学杂志》的可重复性和可重用性。
J Cheminform. 2023 Jun 30;15(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13321-023-00730-y.
6
Pattern of Peer Review in Dermatology Domain: An Analysis of Reviewers' Profile from publons.com.皮肤病学领域的同行评审模式：来自publons.com的审稿人资料分析
Indian J Dermatol. 2021 Mar-Apr;66(2):225. doi: 10.4103/ijd.IJD_326_18.
7
Reimagining the peer-review system for translational health science journals.重新构想转化健康科学期刊的同行评审系统。
Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jul;14(4):1210-1221. doi: 10.1111/cts.13050. Epub 2021 May 7.
8
The limitations to our understanding of peer review.我们对同行评审理解的局限性。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2020 Apr 30;5:6. doi: 10.1186/s41073-020-00092-1. eCollection 2020.
9
A Social Psychological Model of Scientific Practices: Explaining Research Practices and Outlining the Potential for Successful Reforms.科学实践的社会心理学模型：解释研究实践并概述成功改革的潜力。
Psychol Belg. 2019 Sep 12;59(1):353-372. doi: 10.5334/pb.496.
10
Open collaborative writing with Manubot.使用 Manubot 进行开放式协作写作。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Jun 24;15(6):e1007128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007128. eCollection 2019 Jun.
本文引用的文献
1
On the origin of mitosing cells.关于有丝分裂细胞的起源
J Theor Biol. 1967 Mar;14(3):255-74. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(67)90079-3.
Zotero 插件