Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Melbourne Austin Branch, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e44707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044707. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
NY-ESO-1 has been a major target of many immunotherapy trials because it is expressed by various cancers and is highly immunogenic. In this study, we have identified a novel HLA-B1801-restricted CD8(+) T cell epitope, NY-ESO-1(88-96) (LEFYLAMPF) and compared its direct- and cross-presentation to that of the reported NY-ESO-1(157-165) epitope restricted to HLA-A0201. Although both epitopes were readily cross-presented by DCs exposed to various forms of full-length NY-ESO-1 antigen, remarkably NY-ESO-1(88-96) is much more efficiently cross-presented from the soluble form, than NY-ESO-1(157-165). On the other hand, NY-ESO-1(157-165) is efficiently presented by NY-ESO-1-expressing tumor cells and its presentation was not enhanced by IFN-γ treatment, which induced immunoproteasome as demonstrated by Western blots and functionally a decreased presentation of Melan A(26-35); whereas NY-ESO-1(88-96) was very inefficiently presented by the same tumor cell lines, except for one that expressed high level of immunoproteasome. It was only presented when the tumor cells were first IFN-γ treated, followed by infection with recombinant vaccinia virus encoding NY-ESO-1, which dramatically increased NY-ESO-1 expression. These data indicate that the presentation of NY-ESO-1(88-96) is immunoproteasome dependent. Furthermore, a survey was conducted on multiple samples collected from HLA-B18(+) melanoma patients. Surprisingly, all the detectable responses to NY-ESO-1(88-96) from patients, including those who received NY-ESO-1 ISCOMATRIX™ vaccine were induced spontaneously. Taken together, these results imply that some epitopes can be inefficiently presented by tumor cells although the corresponding CD8(+) T cell responses are efficiently primed in vivo by DCs cross-presenting these epitopes. The potential implications for cancer vaccine strategies are further discussed.
NY-ESO-1 是许多免疫疗法试验的主要靶点,因为它在各种癌症中表达,并且具有高度的免疫原性。在这项研究中,我们鉴定了一种新型的 HLA-B1801 限制性 CD8(+) T 细胞表位 NY-ESO-1(88-96)(LEFYLAMPF),并比较了其与报告的 HLA-A0201 限制性 NY-ESO-1(157-165)表位的直接和交叉呈递。尽管两种表位都能被暴露于各种形式全长 NY-ESO-1 抗原的 DC 轻易交叉呈递,但令人惊讶的是,与 NY-ESO-1(157-165)相比,NY-ESO-1(88-96)从可溶性形式中更有效地交叉呈递。另一方面,NY-ESO-1(157-165)由 NY-ESO-1 表达的肿瘤细胞有效地呈递,并且其呈递不受 IFN-γ 处理的增强,Western blot 显示 IFN-γ 诱导免疫蛋白酶体,并且功能上降低了 Melan A(26-35)的呈递;而 NY-ESO-1(88-96)则非常低效地由相同的肿瘤细胞系呈递,除了一种表达高水平免疫蛋白酶体的细胞系。只有在用 IFN-γ 处理肿瘤细胞后,再用编码 NY-ESO-1 的重组牛痘病毒感染时,NY-ESO-1(88-96)才被呈递,这大大增加了 NY-ESO-1 的表达。这些数据表明,NY-ESO-1(88-96)的呈递依赖于免疫蛋白酶体。此外,对来自 HLA-B18(+)黑色素瘤患者的多个样本进行了调查。令人惊讶的是,所有来自患者的对 NY-ESO-1(88-96)的可检测反应,包括那些接受 NY-ESO-1 ISCOMATRIX™疫苗的患者,都是自发诱导的。总之,这些结果表明,尽管相应的 CD8(+) T 细胞反应通过 DC 交叉呈递这些表位在体内被有效地启动,但一些表位仍可能被肿瘤细胞低效地呈递。进一步讨论了这些结果对癌症疫苗策略的潜在影响。