Brunetti L L, Weiss M J, Studenski S A, Clipp E C
Division of General Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
Arch Intern Med. 1990 Jan;150(1):121-6.
We determined the prevalence of written cardiopulmonary resuscitation policies in North Carolina nursing homes and evaluated their content according to predetermined criteria. Questionnaires were mailed to 236 state-registered facilities. Two hundred nine nursing homes (88.5%) responded to the questionnaire; 83% reported having a written policy, and half (86 nursing homes) provided copies. Nine of ten nursing homes reported that cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed at their institution, and a similar number (92%) permitted physician orders restricting cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Written policies were systematically compared with 10 model criteria. Policy content varied substantially. More than half of the policies contained provisions for authorization, informed consent, documentation, competency, review, and applicability of do not resuscitate orders. Less than half contained criteria for autonomy, treatment alternatives, dignity and quality of care, and patient identification. Nursing homes that had written policies were newer, larger, and for-profit; had a greater proportion of skilled nursing care beds; and were more likely to have both Medicare and Medicaid certification. The variations in these policies place nursing home residents at risk for having important personal rights limited or ignored. Inclusion of these 10 policy criteria in a comprehensive cardiopulmonary resuscitation policy would represent an important step toward enhancing the quality of decision making by nursing home residents.
