National Health Laboratory Service, Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, Green Point, Cape Town, South Africa.
J Clin Microbiol. 2012 Nov;50(11):3712-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01958-12. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
Molecular diagnostics for Mycobacterium tuberculosis have recently been endorsed by the World Health Organization. The Xpert MTB/RIF assay was endorsed for use on patient material, regardless of smear gradation, while the GenoType MTBDRplus (version 1) has been limited for use on smear-positive patient material. In this study, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of the Xpert MTB/RIF and GenoType MTBDRplus (version 2) assays on smear-positive and smear-negative patient specimens submitted to a high-throughput diagnostic laboratory. A total of 282 consecutive specimens were subjected to the two new molecular assays, and their performance characteristics were assessed relative to the routine diagnostic standard. Both assays showed similar diagnostic performance characteristics. The sensitivities of the GenoType MTBDRplus (v2.0) and Xpert MTB/RIF assays for the detection of culture-positive M. tuberculosis were 73.1% and 71.2%, respectively, while the specificities of both assays were 100%. Both assays were able to diagnose the presence of M. tuberculosis in 57 to 58% of smear-negative cases, suggesting that the performance characteristics were dependent on bacillary load. The detection of M. tuberculosis in culture-negative specimens confirmed that molecular assays should not be used for treatment monitoring. The sensitivity and specificity for rifampin resistance detection were 100% in both assays; however, the GenoType MTBDRplus (v2.0) assay provided additional information on isoniazid susceptibility. The GenoType MTBDRplus (v2.0) assay will complement the Xpert MTB/RIF screening assay by validating rifampin susceptibility and providing information on isoniazid susceptibility. In addition, the GenoType MTBDRplus (v2.0) assay will provide pharmacogenetic information that may be critical in guiding appropriate treatment.
分子诊断技术最近得到世界卫生组织的认可。Xpert MTB/RIF 检测法可用于所有患者标本,无论痰涂片分级如何,而 GenoType MTBDRplus(版本 1)则限于用于痰涂片阳性的患者标本。本研究评估了 Xpert MTB/RIF 和 GenoType MTBDRplus(版本 2)检测法在高容量诊断实验室提交的痰涂片阳性和阴性患者标本中的诊断性能。总共对 282 份连续标本进行了这两种新的分子检测,并根据常规诊断标准评估了其性能特征。两种检测方法均表现出相似的诊断性能特征。GenoType MTBDRplus(v2.0)和 Xpert MTB/RIF 检测法对培养阳性结核分枝杆菌的敏感性分别为 73.1%和 71.2%,而两种检测方法的特异性均为 100%。两种检测方法都能在 57%至 58%的痰涂片阴性病例中诊断结核分枝杆菌的存在,这表明检测性能取决于细菌负荷。在培养阴性标本中检测到结核分枝杆菌,证实分子检测不应用于治疗监测。两种检测方法对利福平耐药的检测敏感性和特异性均为 100%;然而,GenoType MTBDRplus(v2.0)检测法还提供了异烟肼敏感性的信息。GenoType MTBDRplus(v2.0)检测法将通过验证利福平敏感性和提供异烟肼敏感性信息,补充 Xpert MTB/RIF 筛查检测法。此外,GenoType MTBDRplus(v2.0)检测法将提供可能对指导适当治疗至关重要的药物遗传学信息。