Suppr超能文献

单环左心房后壁(方框)隔离与广泛的肺静脉窦隔离相比,在长期随访中导致不同的复发模式:无房颤生存时间更长,但任何房性心律失常无复发时间相似。

Single-ring posterior left atrial (box) isolation results in a different mode of recurrence compared with wide antral pulmonary vein isolation on long-term follow-up: longer atrial fibrillation-free survival time but similar survival time free of any atrial arrhythmia.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012 Oct;5(5):968-77. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.111.970293. Epub 2012 Sep 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electric isolation of the pulmonary veins and posterior left atrium with a single ring of radiofrequency lesions (single-ring isolation [SRI]) may result in fewer atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrences than wide antral pulmonary vein isolation (wide antral isolation [WAI]) by abolishing extravenous AF triggers. The effect of mitral isthmus line (MIL) ablation on outcomes after SRI has not previously been assessed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We randomly assigned 220 consecutive patients (58 ± 10 years old; 82% men) with highly symptomatic AF (61% paroxysmal, 39% persistent/longstanding persistent) to undergo either SRI or WAI. Half of each cohort was also randomly allocated to have left lateral MIL ablation (2 ×2 factorial study design). Patients were followed clinically and with 7-day Holter studies for arrhythmia recurrences. The primary end points were recurrence of AF and organized atrial tachyarrhythmias. AF-free survival at 2 years was better after SRI (74% [95% CI, 65%-82%]) than WAI (61% [51%-70%]; P=0.031). Organized atrial tachyarrhythmia-free survival was similar after SRI and WAI (67% [57%-75%] ersus 64% [54%-72%], respectively, at 2 years; P=0.988). MIL ablation resulted in better 2-year organized atrial tachyarrhythmia-free survival (71% [62%-79%] versus 60% [50%-69%]; P=0.07), which approached statistical significance. Survival free of any atrial arrhythmia after one procedure was not significantly affected by isolation technique or MIL ablation. Conclusions- SRI resulted in fewer AF recurrences compared with WAI on long-term follow-up but did not reduce the recurrence of all atrial arrhythmias. MIL ablation may reduce organized atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences. Clinical Trial Registration- http://www.anzctr.org.au; ACTRN12606000467538.

摘要

背景

与广泛的肺静脉前庭隔离(广泛肺静脉隔离[WAI])相比,通过消融一条环肺静脉和左心房后侧壁的射频消融线(单环隔离[SRI])可能会减少心房颤动(AF)的复发,因为它消除了额外的静脉触发因素。然而,此前尚未评估二尖瓣峡部线(MIL)消融对 SRI 后结果的影响。

方法和结果

我们连续入选了 220 例有症状的 AF 患者(58±10 岁;82%为男性),这些患者的 AF 为高度症状性(61%为阵发性,39%为持续性/长期持续性),他们被随机分为 SRI 或 WAI 组。每个队列的一半患者也被随机分为接受左侧外侧 MIL 消融(2×2 析因研究设计)。通过临床和 7 天 Holter 研究来随访心律失常的复发情况。主要终点是 AF 和有组织的房性心动过速的复发。2 年时,SRI 的 AF 无复发生存率(74%[95%CI,65%-82%])优于 WAI(61%[51%-70%];P=0.031)。SRI 和 WAI 的有组织的房性心动过速无复发生存率相似(2 年时分别为 67%[57%-75%]和 64%[54%-72%];P=0.988)。MIL 消融使 2 年时的有组织的房性心动过速无复发生存率更好(71%[62%-79%]与 60%[50%-69%];P=0.07),但未达到统计学意义。单次手术治疗后,无任何房性心律失常的生存率不受隔离技术或 MIL 消融的影响。

结论

在长期随访中,与 WAI 相比,SRI 可减少 AF 的复发,但不能减少所有房性心律失常的复发。MIL 消融可能减少有组织的房性心动过速的复发。

临床试验注册

http://www.anzctr.org.au;ACTRN12606000467538。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验