Huberle Elisabeth, Rupek Paul, Lappe Markus, Karnath Hans-Otto
Section Neuropsychology, Center of Neurology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen Tübingen, Germany.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2012 Aug 28;6:56. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00056. eCollection 2012.
Over the past 25 years, visual processing has been discussed in the context of the dual stream hypothesis consisting of a ventral ("what") and a dorsal ("where") visual information processing pathway. Patients with brain damage of the ventral pathway typically present with signs of visual agnosia, the inability to identify and discriminate objects by visual exploration, but show normal perception of motion perception. A dissociation between the perception of biological motion and non-biological motion has been suggested: perception of biological motion might be impaired when "non-biological" motion perception is intact and vice versa. The impact of object recognition on the perception of biological motion remains unclear. We thus investigated this question in a patient with severe visual agnosia, who showed normal perception of non-biological motion. The data suggested that the patient's perception of biological motion remained largely intact. However, when tested with objects constructed of coherently moving dots ("Shape-from-Motion"), recognition was severely impaired. The results are discussed in the context of possible mechanisms of biological motion perception.
在过去25年里,视觉处理一直是在双流假说的背景下进行讨论的,该假说由腹侧(“是什么”)和背侧(“在哪里”)视觉信息处理通路组成。腹侧通路脑损伤的患者通常表现出视觉失认症的症状,即无法通过视觉探索识别和区分物体,但运动感知正常。有人提出生物运动感知和非生物运动感知之间存在分离:当“非生物”运动感知完好时,生物运动感知可能受损,反之亦然。物体识别对生物运动感知的影响仍不清楚。因此,我们对一名患有严重视觉失认症但非生物运动感知正常的患者进行了这一问题的研究。数据表明,该患者的生物运动感知在很大程度上保持完好。然而,当用由连贯移动的点构成的物体(“从运动中感知形状”)进行测试时,识别能力严重受损。我们将在生物运动感知的可能机制背景下对结果进行讨论。