Suppr超能文献

机械性淋巴引流联合热疗对淋巴水肿的影响。

The effect of mechanical lymph drainage accompanied with heat on lymphedema.

作者信息

Mariana Valente Flávia, de Fátima Guerreiro Godoy Maria, Maria Pereira de Godoy José

机构信息

Associate Professor, Godoy Clinic, Paulista University, São Jose do Rio Preto, Brazil.

出版信息

J Res Med Sci. 2011 Nov;16(11):1448-51.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Thermotherapy has been indicated by some researchers as a treatment for lymphedema. A study comparing temperatures demonstrated that a temperature of 40°C significantly increased the transportation of lymph compared to other temperatures assessed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible benefits of mechanical lymph drainage accompanied with heat in the treatment of lymphedema of the lower limbs.

METHODS

In a cross-over randomized study, the effect of heat on lymph drainage was evaluated in the treatment of leg lymphedema. The study, performed in the Godoy Clinic in São Jose do Rio Preto, Brazil, involved seven patients (two males and five females) with leg lymphedema. The patients' ages ranged from 18 to 79 years old with a mean of 48.5 years. The subjects underwent a total of 38 assessments including 19 evaluations of mechanical lymph drainage alone and 19 combined with thermotherapy. Heat was applied using an electric blanket which was wrapped around the legs of the patients. The volume of legs was evaluated by water plethysmography before and after treatment sessions. The paired t-test was used for statistical analysis with an alpha error of p = 0.05 being considered as acceptable.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were evidenced between mechanical lymph drainage alone and lymph drainage combined with thermotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no obvious synergic effect in the immediate post-treatment period when heat was combined with mechanical lymph drainage in the treatment of lymphedema.

摘要

背景

一些研究人员已指出热疗法可用于治疗淋巴水肿。一项比较不同温度的研究表明,与其他评估温度相比,40°C的温度能显著增加淋巴的运输。本研究的目的是评估机械性淋巴引流联合热疗在治疗下肢淋巴水肿中的潜在益处。

方法

在一项交叉随机研究中,评估了热疗对腿部淋巴水肿治疗中淋巴引流的影响。该研究在巴西里约普雷图圣若泽的戈多伊诊所进行,纳入了7例腿部淋巴水肿患者(2例男性和5例女性)。患者年龄在18至79岁之间,平均年龄为48.5岁。受试者共接受了38次评估,包括19次单独的机械性淋巴引流评估和19次联合热疗的评估。使用电热毯包裹患者腿部来施加热量。在治疗前后通过水容积描记法评估腿部体积。采用配对t检验进行统计分析,将p = 0.05的α错误视为可接受。

结果

单独的机械性淋巴引流与联合热疗的淋巴引流之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。

结论

在治疗淋巴水肿时,热疗与机械性淋巴引流联合使用在治疗后即刻没有明显的协同效应。

相似文献

2
Evaluation of lymph drainage using bioelectrical impedance of the body.利用人体生物电阻抗评估淋巴引流。
Phlebology. 2011 Oct;26(7):298-300. doi: 10.1258/phleb.2010.010034. Epub 2011 May 16.
7
Lymph drainage in pregnant women.孕妇的淋巴引流
Nurs Res Pract. 2013;2013:364582. doi: 10.1155/2013/364582. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
8
Intensive treatment of leg lymphedema.腿部淋巴水肿的强化治疗
Indian J Dermatol. 2010 Apr-Jun;55(2):144-7. doi: 10.4103/0019-5154.62745.

引用本文的文献

4
Biology of Lymphedema.淋巴水肿生物学
Biology (Basel). 2021 Mar 25;10(4):261. doi: 10.3390/biology10040261.
6
Aesthetic Applications of Radiofrequency: Lymphatic and Perfusion Assessment.射频的美学应用:淋巴及灌注评估
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2020 Oct 26;8(10):e3193. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003193. eCollection 2020 Oct.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验