• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

互联网时代的代理决策。

Surrogate decision making in the internet age.

机构信息

Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.

出版信息

Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(10):28-33. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.708088.

DOI:10.1080/15265161.2012.708088
PMID:22974028
Abstract

The computer revolution has had an enormous effect on all aspects of the practice of medicine, yet little thought has been given to the role of social media in identifying treatment choices for incompetent patients. We are currently living in the "Internet age" and many people have integrated social media into all aspects of their lives. As use becomes more prevalent, and as users age, social media are more likely to be viewed as a source of information regarding medical care preferences. This article explores the ethical and legal issues raised by the use of social media in surrogate decision making.

摘要

计算机革命对医学实践的各个方面都产生了巨大的影响,但很少有人考虑社交媒体在确定无行为能力患者的治疗选择方面的作用。我们现在正生活在“互联网时代”,许多人已经将社交媒体融入到生活的各个方面。随着使用的普及,以及用户年龄的增长,社交媒体更有可能被视为医疗偏好信息的来源。本文探讨了在代理决策中使用社交媒体所引发的伦理和法律问题。

相似文献

1
Surrogate decision making in the internet age.互联网时代的代理决策。
Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(10):28-33. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.708088.
2
Are we prepared for surrogate decision making in the internet age?在互联网时代,我们是否为替代决策做好准备?
Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(10):47-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.708093.
3
Considerations in surrogate decision making in the internet age.互联网时代代理决策中的考量因素。
Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(10):51. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.711900.
4
A disability response to surrogate decision making in the internet age.互联网时代对替代决策的残疾回应。
Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(10):36-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.711899.
5
Response to open peer commentaries on "Surrogate decision making in the internet age".对关于“互联网时代的替代决策”的公开同行评论的回应。
Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(10):W1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.712417.
6
Status update: the complexities of the internet age bring urgency for deliberately making advance health care decision wishes known.
Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(10):49-50. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.708092.
7
Facebook can improve surrogate decision making.脸书可以改善替代决策。
Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(10):43-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.708095.
8
Surrogate decision making 2.0: digital evidence as clinical testimony.替代决策2.0:作为临床证据的数字证据
Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(10):34-6. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.708096.
9
Claims about surrogate decision-making accuracy require empirical evidence.关于替代决策准确性的说法需要实证证据。
Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(10):41-3. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.708090.
10
The self, social media, and social construction.
Am J Bioeth. 2012;12(10):38-9. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2012.708094.

引用本文的文献

1
Access for Cancer Caregivers to Education and Support for Shared Decision Making (ACCESS) intervention: a cluster cross-over randomised clinical trial.癌症护理人员参与共同决策的教育与支持(ACCESS)干预措施:一项整群交叉随机临床试验。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023 Mar 2. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2022-004100.
2
Delivering patient decision aids on the Internet: definitions, theories, current evidence, and emerging research areas.互联网上提供患者决策辅助工具:定义、理论、现有证据和新兴研究领域。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S13. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S13. Epub 2013 Nov 29.