Suppr超能文献

中文儿童新型一次性环切器环切术:随机对照试验。

Circumcision with a novel disposable device in Chinese children: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital, Nanjing University, School of Medicine, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Int J Urol. 2013 Feb;20(2):220-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03132.x. Epub 2012 Sep 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the outcomes and complications of three methods of circumcision in a Chinese pediatric population.

METHODS

A total of 120 children were randomly assigned to three groups. Group I was submitted to circumcision using the Shenghuan disposable device according to Yan's method; group II was submitted to circumcision using the same device, but according to Peng's methods; group III was operated on by using the conventional scalpel/suture technique. The three groups were compared mainly by the following outcomes: duration of surgery, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative pain, cosmetic effect, and the rates of edema, dehiscence, scarring, adhesion and infection.

RESULTS

Groups I and II had less intraoperative bleeding. In terms of the duration of surgery, group I was the quickest. Pain scores in using the Shenghuan disposable device were higher at 6 h after surgery compared with the conventional scalpel/suture technique. The percentage of patients using paracetamol in group II was higher than that in group III at 12 h after surgery. Other complications were similar, and all three groups had successful outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Circumcision using the Shenghuan disposable device represents a safer and time-saving option compared with the conventional scalpel/suture technique, with better cosmetic outcomes. Yan's method seems to be better than Peng's method when using the Shenghuan disposable device for circumcision in children.

摘要

目的

比较三种包皮环切术方法在中国儿科人群中的效果和并发症。

方法

将 120 例儿童随机分为三组。I 组采用一次性使用环切器按严法行包皮环切术;II 组采用相同的器械,但按彭法操作;III 组采用传统的手术刀/缝线技术进行手术。主要通过手术时间、术中出血、术后疼痛、美容效果以及水肿、裂开、瘢痕、粘连和感染的发生率来比较三组。

结果

I 组和 II 组术中出血量较少。在手术时间方面,I 组最快。使用一次性环切器的患者在术后 6 小时疼痛评分高于传统手术刀/缝线技术。术后 12 小时,II 组使用扑热息痛的患者比例高于 III 组。其他并发症相似,三组均取得成功。

结论

与传统手术刀/缝线技术相比,一次性使用环切器更安全、省时,且美容效果更好。在使用一次性环切器为儿童行包皮环切术时,严法似乎优于彭法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验