Suppr超能文献

儿童颈胸肿块的手术入路。

The surgical approach for cervicothoracic masses in children.

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Surgery, Pediatric Department, University-Hospital of Padua, 35128 Padua, Italy.

出版信息

J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Sep;47(9):1662-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2012.03.087.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The surgical approach to masses located in the cervicothoracic juncton represents a challenge for surgeons. Many techniques have been described with good results.

METHODS

We analyzed and compared the results obtained in 2 Italian pediatric surgery centers using 2 different techniques in patients with tumors of the thoracic inlet: center 1, using anterior cervical transsternal approach on 7 patients, and center 2, applying "trap-door" technique on 5 patients.

RESULTS

Excision was incomplete in 5 patients and complete in 7 patients. Histologic examination revealed 5 patients with neuroblastoma; 3, ganglioneuroblastoma; 1, mixoid liposarcoma; 1, desmoid fibromatosis; 1, Castleman disease; and 1, Schwann cell tumor. The median duration of the procedure was 345 minutes in center 1 and 245 minutes in center 2. The median blood loss was 200 mL in both centers. The median hospital stay was 11 days in center 1 and 9 days in center 2. Globally, 5 patients developed postoperative complications. No significant differences were encountered comparing the main surgical outcome parameters between the 2 approaches.

CONCLUSIONS

Both techniques resulted in valid options to achieve a safe excision of thoracic inlet masses with a manageable complication rate and acceptable hospital stay. Surgical risk factors should be carefully investigated preoperatively. Postoperative pain control is important to guarantee early recovery.

摘要

背景

位于颈胸交界处的肿块的手术入路对外科医生来说是一个挑战。已经描述了许多技术,并且取得了良好的效果。

方法

我们分析并比较了意大利 2 个小儿外科中心使用 2 种不同技术治疗胸入口肿瘤患者的结果:中心 1 对 7 例患者采用经颈前胸骨切开术,中心 2 对 5 例患者采用“陷阱门”技术。

结果

5 例患者切除不完全,7 例患者切除完全。组织学检查显示 5 例为神经母细胞瘤;3 例为节细胞神经母细胞瘤;1 例为混合性脂肪肉瘤;1 例为硬纤维瘤;1 例为Castleman 病;1 例为施万细胞瘤。中心 1 的手术时间中位数为 345 分钟,中心 2 为 245 分钟。2 个中心的中位出血量均为 200ml。中心 1 的中位住院时间为 11 天,中心 2 为 9 天。总体而言,有 5 例患者发生术后并发症。两种方法的主要手术结果参数比较无显著差异。

结论

这两种技术都是安全切除胸入口肿块的有效选择,并发症发生率可管理,住院时间可接受。手术风险因素应在术前仔细研究。术后疼痛控制对于保证早期恢复非常重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验