何时进行进一步的临床试验是合理的？ - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

When is a further clinical trial justified?

作者信息

Ferreira Manuela L, Herbert Robert D, Crowther Michael J, Verhagen Arianne, Sutton Alex J

机构信息

The George Institute for Global Health, University of Sydney, PO Box M201, Missenden Road, NSW 2050, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ. 2012 Sep 13;345:e5913. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5913.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.e5913

PMID:22977141

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

When is a further clinical trial justified?何时进行进一步的临床试验是合理的？

BMJ. 2012 Sep 13;345:e5913. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e5913.

Cost-effectiveness of an intensive group training protocol compared to physiotherapy guideline care for sub-acute and chronic low back pain: design of a randomised controlled trial with an economic evaluation. [ISRCTN45641649].与物理治疗指南护理相比，强化小组训练方案对亚急性和慢性下腰痛的成本效益：一项带有经济评估的随机对照试验设计。[国际标准随机对照试验编号：ISRCTN45641649]

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2004 Nov 23;5:45. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-5-45.

Issues in the meta-analysis of cluster randomized trials.整群随机试验的Meta分析中的问题。

Stat Med. 2002 Oct 15;21(19):2971-80. doi: 10.1002/sim.1301.

Commentary: The debate on non-inferiority trials: 'when meta-analysis alone is not helpful'.评论：关于非劣效性试验的辩论：“仅靠荟萃分析无济于事时”

Int J Epidemiol. 2010 Dec;39(6):1582-3. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyq197.

ALS issues in clinical trials. Missing data.临床试验中的肌萎缩侧索硬化症问题。数据缺失。

Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord. 2004 Sep;5 Suppl 1:48-51. doi: 10.1080/17434470410019753.

Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.基于证据的医学、系统评价以及介入性疼痛管理指南：第6部分。观察性研究的系统评价与荟萃分析

Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):819-50.

Clinical trials methodology: randomization, intent-to-treat, and random-effects regression.临床试验方法：随机化、意向性分析和随机效应回归。

Depress Anxiety. 2009;26(8):697-700. doi: 10.1002/da.20594.

Annals Understanding Clinical Research: Implications of Missing Data Due to Dropout.《临床研究年鉴：因失访导致数据缺失的影响》

Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 18;166(8):596-598. doi: 10.7326/M17-0195. Epub 2017 Feb 28.

Re: The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: parallels with the design of randomized trials.关于：因果效应观察性研究的设计与分析：与随机试验设计的相似之处。

Stat Med. 2008 Jun 30;27(14):2740-1; author reply 2741-2. doi: 10.1002/sim.3172.

Randomized trials or population-based registries.随机试验或基于人群的登记处。

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Sep;34(3):253-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.06.014.

引用本文的文献

Research waste in randomised trials of exercise treatments for chronic low back pain: trial sequential and cumulative meta-analyses by publication date and size.慢性下腰痛运动疗法随机试验中的研究浪费：按发表日期和规模进行的试验序贯分析和累积荟萃分析

BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 25;15(3):e087787. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087787.

Effect of exercise therapy in patients with hip osteoarthritis: A systematic review and cumulative meta-analysis.运动疗法对髋骨关节炎患者的影响：一项系统评价和累积荟萃分析。

Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2023 Jan 19;5(1):100338. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2023.100338. eCollection 2023 Mar.

Systematic reviews are rarely used to contextualise new results-a systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies.系统评价很少用于新结果的背景化——一项对元研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 5;11(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02062-8.

Efficacy, acceptability, and safety of antidepressants for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗腰痛的疗效、可接受性和安全性：系统评价和荟萃分析。

Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 24;10(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01599-4.

Efficacy and Safety of Medicines Targeting Neurotrophic Factors in the Management of Low Back Pain: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.针对神经营养因子的药物治疗腰痛的疗效与安全性：系统评价与荟萃分析方案

JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Jan 22;10(1):e22905. doi: 10.2196/22905.

Synthesizing existing evidence to design future trials: survey of methodologists from European institutions.综合现有证据设计未来试验：欧洲机构方法学家的调查。

Trials. 2019 Jun 7;20(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3449-6.

Surveys of parents and clinicians concerning the minimally important difference of probiotic therapy for prevention of paediatric antibiotic-associated diarrhoea.家长和临床医生对益生菌疗法预防儿童抗生素相关性腹泻的最小重要差异的调查。

BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 2;9(4):e024651. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024651.

Use of a random effects meta-analysis in the design and analysis of a new clinical trial.在新临床试验的设计和分析中使用随机效应荟萃分析。

Stat Med. 2018 Dec 30;37(30):4665-4679. doi: 10.1002/sim.7948. Epub 2018 Sep 6.

Planning a future randomized clinical trial based on a network of relevant past trials.基于一系列相关既往试验构建的网络来规划未来的随机临床试验。

Trials. 2018 Jul 11;19(1):365. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2740-2.

Using Bayesian statistics to estimate the likelihood a new trial will demonstrate the efficacy of a new treatment.使用贝叶斯统计来估计一项新试验展示新疗法疗效的可能性。

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Aug 22;17(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0401-x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验