Machado Ana L, Bochio Bruna C, Wady Amanda F, Jorge Janaina H, Canevarolo Sebastião V, Vergani Carlos E
Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araraquara Dental School, UNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.
J Dent Biomech. 2012;3:1758736012459535. doi: 10.1177/1758736012459535. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
This study evaluated the impact strength of a denture base resin (Lucitone 550-L) and four reline resins (Tokuyama Rebase II-T; Ufi Gel Hard-U; New Truliner-NT, and Kooliner-K), both intact and in a reline combination (L/L, L/T, L/U, L/NT, and L/K). For each group (n = 20), half of the specimens were thermocycled before testing. Charpy tests were performed, and the impact strengths were calculated. Data were analyzed by two-way analyses of variance and Tukey's test (p = 0.05). For the intact groups, mean impact strength values for L (1.65 and 1.50) were significantly higher than those of the reline resins (0.38-1.17). For the relined groups, the highest mean impact strength values were produced by L/T (5.76 and 5.12), L/NT (6.20 and 6.03), and L/K (5.60 and 5.31) and the lowest by L/U (0.76 and 0.78). There were no significant differences between L and L/L. Thermocycling reduced the impact strength of T (from 0.73 to 0.38) and L/L (from 1.82 to 1.56).
本研究评估了一种义齿基托树脂(Lucitone 550-L)和四种重衬树脂(德山重衬II-T;Ufi Gel Hard-U;新Truliner-NT和Kooliner-K)在完整状态以及重衬组合状态(L/L、L/T、L/U、L/NT和L/K)下的冲击强度。对于每组(n = 20),一半的样本在测试前进行了热循环处理。进行了夏比试验,并计算了冲击强度。数据通过双向方差分析和Tukey检验进行分析(p = 0.05)。对于完整组,L的平均冲击强度值(1.65和1.50)显著高于重衬树脂(0.38 - 1.17)。对于重衬组,L/T(5.76和5.12)、L/NT(6.20和6.03)和L/K(5.60和5.31)产生的平均冲击强度值最高,L/U(0.76和0.78)产生的最低。L和L/L之间没有显著差异。热循环降低了T(从0.73降至0.38)和L/L(从1.82降至1.56)的冲击强度。