Suppr超能文献

评价德国、奥地利和瑞士目前针对髌前和鹰嘴滑囊炎急性创伤性损伤的治疗概念。

Evaluation of the current treatment concepts in Germany, Austria and Switzerland for acute traumatic lesions to the prepatellar and olecranon bursa.

机构信息

Department of Trauma Surgery - Campus Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Nussbaumstrasse 20, 80336 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Injury. 2013 Nov;44(11):1423-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.008. Epub 2012 Sep 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although traumatic lacerations of the olecranon (OB) and praepatellar bursae (PB) are common entities often associated with complications, no study could be found on this injury. The aim of this study was to survey the current treatment concepts for acute traumatic laceration of the OB and PB in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An international online survey was conducted among orthopaedic and trauma surgeons in Germany (TraumaNetwork DGU), Austria (Austrian Society of Trauma (ÖGU) and Orthopaedic (ÖGO) Surgeons) and Switzerland (Swiss Orthopaedic Surgeons and Swiss Society of Infectious Disease (CH)) (n=1967). The survey comprised of five demographical questions, the current treatment concepts were evaluated using a case study.

RESULTS

The overall-response-rate was 16% (12-46%). 88% of the responding physicians were male, aged 47.5 ± 10.2 years with a mean working experience of 20.1 ± 10.6 years. 54% of the surveyed physicians were either senior or chief physicians. Treatment concepts varied significantly between DGU and ÖGO/CH (p=0.02/p=0.006), no significant differences could be found between DGU and ÖGU. Generally, German and Austrian trauma surgeons favoured bursectomy (86.7%/90.9%) and immobilisation (68.3%/77.3%). Austrian orthopaedic surgeons performed fewer bursectomies (69.3%) but had the highest proportion for administering antibiotics (73.9%). Less than 50% of Swiss physicians indicated bursectomy as a treatment option.

CONCLUSION

Overall, this survey revealed a significant heterogeneity in treatment approaches in Central Europe. Further evidence is needed to identify the best treatment concepts for traumatic lacerations of the OB and PB.

摘要

背景

尽管鹰嘴突(OB)和髌前滑囊炎(PB)的创伤性撕裂是常见的并发症实体,但目前尚未发现关于该损伤的研究。本研究旨在调查德国、奥地利和瑞士目前对急性创伤性 OB 和 PB 撕裂的治疗概念。

材料和方法

在德国(创伤网络 DGU)、奥地利(奥地利创伤协会(ÖGU)和骨科医生(ÖGO))和瑞士(瑞士骨科医生和瑞士传染病学会(CH)),对骨科和创伤外科医生进行了一项国际在线调查(n=1967)。该调查包括五个人口统计学问题,使用病例研究评估当前的治疗概念。

结果

总回复率为 16%(12-46%)。88%的参与调查的医生为男性,年龄 47.5±10.2 岁,平均工作经验为 20.1±10.6 年。54%的调查医生为高级或首席医生。在 DGU 和 ÖGO/CH 之间,治疗概念存在显著差异(p=0.02/p=0.006),而在 DGU 和 ÖGU 之间则无显著差异。一般来说,德国和奥地利的创伤外科医生倾向于滑囊切除术(86.7%/90.9%)和固定(68.3%/77.3%)。奥地利骨科医生的滑囊切除术较少(69.3%),但使用抗生素的比例最高(73.9%)。不到 50%的瑞士医生将滑囊切除术作为治疗选择。

结论

总体而言,该调查显示中欧地区的治疗方法存在显著异质性。需要进一步的证据来确定治疗 OB 和 PB 创伤性撕裂的最佳治疗概念。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验