[不同的名称，相同的含义？美国的比较效果研究与以患者为中心的结局研究]
[Different name, same meaning? Comparative effectiveness research and patient-centered outcomes research in the USA].
作者信息
Gerhardus Ansgar
机构信息
Abteilung 1: Versorgungsforschung Institut für Public Health und Pflegeforschung, Universität Bremen.
出版信息
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(7):479-83. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.07.019. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
In 2009 the Congress of the USA commissioned a program on "Comparative Effectiveness Research" (CER) for two years. The program was funded with 1.1 billion USD and aims at projects that are directly relevant for the care of patients, investigate research questions and populations where research gaps are considerable, and which compare at least two interventions. Three years later it seems that in the USA CER has been replaced by "Patient-Centered Outcomes Research" (PCOR). This article summarizes the conceptual and empirical development of CER since 2009 and looks at the similarities and differences between CER and PCOR.
2009年，美国国会委托开展了一项为期两年的“比较效果研究”（CER）项目。该项目获得了11亿美元的资金，旨在开展与患者护理直接相关的项目，研究研究问题和研究差距较大的人群，并比较至少两种干预措施。三年后，在美国，CER似乎已被“以患者为中心的结果研究”（PCOR）所取代。本文总结了自2009年以来CER的概念和实证发展，并探讨了CER与PCOR之间的异同。
Zotero 插件