Retrospective analysis of clinical outcomes with neoadjuvant cisplatin-based regimens for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

BACKGROUND

The benefit of neoadjuvant methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin (Adriamycin), and cisplatin (MVAC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) has been prospectively demonstrated in a phase III study. Extrapolating from comparative data in the metastatic setting, platinum doublets such as cisplatin-gemcitabine (CG) have been adopted. We sought to compare clinical outcomes in patients treated for MIBC with neoadjuvant CG and MVAC at our institution.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with MIBC were identified from a prospectively maintained registry. Clinicopathologic information and clinical outcome data were obtained directly from the registry. When available, pharmacy records were reviewed to ascertain the use of growth factors and chemotherapy dose intensity (DI). Survival was compared in subgroups divided by the regimen of chemotherapy rendered (ie, CG vs. MVAC) using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Median overall survival (OS) in the overall cohort (N = 61) was 23 months. OS was improved in patients receiving either MVAC or CG chemotherapy compared with patients receiving "other" chemotherapy (35.3 vs. 16.3 months; P = .055). Although the median OS associated with neoadjuvant CG numerically exceeded the survival associated with neoadjuvant MVAC (104.3 and 21.8 months, respectively), this was not statistically significant (P = .73). Pathologic downstaging predicted improved OS with both neoadjuvant CG and MVAC, and the rates of downstaging were similar with both regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Although warranting prospective validation, our data suggest that CG is a possible alternative neoadjuvant approach to traditional regimens such as MVAC for patients with MIBC.