• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知过程对农村土地所有者应对气候变化的影响。

The influence of cognitive processes on rural landholder responses to climate change.

机构信息

Institute for Land, Water and Society, Charles Sturt University, PO Box 789, Albury, New South Wales 2640, Australia.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2012 Nov 30;111:258-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.07.015. Epub 2012 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.07.015
PMID:22982250
Abstract

Global climate change modelling has identified south-east Australia as a 'hot spot' for more frequent climatic extremes. Rural landholders may be vulnerable to the risks climate change presents. Australia's rural landholders are considered highly adaptable, with a history of responding to climatic uncertainty and variability. Yet it is possible that some of their adaptations will not be effective in reducing vulnerability, and may have downstream impacts. Rural landholder decision making is complex, and this is one of a limited number of papers examining rural landholder responses to climate change and the factors influencing their decisions. Data were gathered using semi-structured interviews and a mail survey of rural landholders in two districts. Established socio-psychological scales were employed to measure beliefs, values and attitudes that are expected to shape landholder behaviour. Most of the rural landholders surveyed were not climate change 'deniers' with 70% agreeing that the climate is changing and that human activity is a major influence. Climate change was nominated as an influence on six adaptive behaviours by 50% or more of survey respondents. However, there were no significant relationships between belief in climate change and adaptive actions. Personal values and worldviews were found to be the most frequent factors linked to adaptive behaviour. These findings illustrate the complex nature of rural landholder decision making: suggesting that many rural landholders do not need convincing of the existence of climate change; and that efforts to motivate rural landholders to respond to climate change risks should be based on sound knowledge of their values and worldviews.

摘要

全球气候变化模型将澳大利亚东南部确定为气候极端事件更频繁发生的“热点”地区。农村土地所有者可能容易受到气候变化带来的风险的影响。澳大利亚的农村土地所有者被认为具有高度的适应性,他们有着应对气候不确定性和变化的历史。然而,他们的一些适应措施可能无法有效降低脆弱性,并且可能会产生下游影响。农村土地所有者的决策是复杂的,这是为数不多的几篇研究农村土地所有者对气候变化的反应以及影响他们决策的因素的论文之一。数据是通过对两个地区的农村土地所有者进行半结构化访谈和邮件调查收集的。采用了成熟的社会心理学量表来衡量那些预计会影响土地所有者行为的信念、价值观和态度。接受调查的农村土地所有者中,大多数不是气候变化“否认者”,有 70%的人认为气候正在发生变化,人类活动是主要影响因素。气候变化被 50%或更多的调查受访者提名对六种适应行为有影响。然而,气候变化的信念与适应行为之间没有显著关系。个人价值观和世界观被发现是与适应行为最频繁相关的因素。这些发现说明了农村土地所有者决策的复杂性:这表明许多农村土地所有者并不需要证明气候变化的存在;为了促使农村土地所有者应对气候变化风险,应该基于对他们价值观和世界观的充分了解。

相似文献

1
The influence of cognitive processes on rural landholder responses to climate change.认知过程对农村土地所有者应对气候变化的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Nov 30;111:258-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.07.015. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
2
The acceptability of climate change in agricultural communities: comparing responses across variability and change.农业社区对气候变化的接受程度:比较不同变异性和变化下的反应。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Jan 30;115:69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.003. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
3
Assessing conservation opportunity on private land: socio-economic, behavioral, and spatial dimensions.评估私人土地上的保护机会:社会经济、行为和空间维度。
J Environ Manage. 2011 Oct;92(10):2513-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.05.015. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
4
A landholder-based approach to the design of private-land conservation programs.基于土地所有者的私人土地保护规划设计方法。
Conserv Biol. 2011 Jun;25(3):493-503. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01639.x. Epub 2011 Feb 10.
5
Entangled judgments: expert preferences for adapting biodiversity conservation to climate change.纠缠的判断:专家对调整生物多样性保护以适应气候变化的偏好。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Nov 15;129:555-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.07.033. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
6
A conjoint analysis of landholder preferences for reward-based land-management contracts in Kapingazi watershed, Eastern Mount Kenya.肯尼亚东部山区卡平加齐流域基于奖励的土地管理合同中土地所有者偏好的联合分析。
J Environ Manage. 2011 Oct;92(10):2634-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
7
Personal circumstances and social characteristics as determinants of landholder participation in biodiversity conservation programs.个人情况和社会特征对土地所有者参与生物多样性保护计划的决定因素。
J Environ Manage. 2012 Dec 30;113:292-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.003. Epub 2012 Oct 16.
8
Drought, drying and climate change: emerging health issues for ageing Australians in rural areas.干旱、干燥与气候变化:澳大利亚农村地区老年人群面临的新出现的健康问题。
Australas J Ageing. 2010 Mar;29(1):2-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2010.00424.x.
9
Landholder typologies illuminate pathways for social change in a deforestation hotspot.土地所有者类型学照亮了一个森林砍伐热点地区社会变革的途径。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Jan 15;254:109777. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109777. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
10
Climate change and coastal environmental risk perceptions in Florida.气候变化与佛罗里达州沿海环境风险认知
J Environ Manage. 2013 Nov 30;130:32-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.038. Epub 2013 Sep 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Farmers' Intended Weed Management after a Potential Glyphosate Ban in Austria.奥地利潜在草甘膦禁令后农民的除草意向管理。
Environ Manage. 2022 May;69(5):871-886. doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01611-0. Epub 2022 Feb 25.
2
Our Environmental Value Orientations Influence How We Respond to Climate Change.我们的环境价值取向影响我们应对气候变化的方式。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 18;10:938. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00938. eCollection 2019.
3
Exploring Farmers' Climate Change Perceptions and Adaptation Intentions: Empirical Evidence from Austria.
探讨农民对气候变化的认知和适应意图:来自奥地利的实证证据。
Environ Manage. 2019 Jun;63(6):804-821. doi: 10.1007/s00267-019-01158-7. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
4
Farmers' Preferences for Future Agricultural Land Use Under the Consideration of Climate Change.气候变化背景下农民对未来农业土地利用的偏好
Environ Manage. 2016 Sep;58(3):446-64. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0720-4. Epub 2016 Jul 2.