Suppr超能文献

磁共振成像引导下前列腺穿刺活检前诊断前列腺癌:随机与靶向穿刺的比较

Prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging and prostate cancer detection: comparison of random and targeted biopsies.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Urol. 2013 Feb;189(2):493-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.195. Epub 2012 Oct 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We compared the accuracy of visual targeted biopsies vs computerized transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging registration using a rigid (Esaote®, nondeformable) or elastic (Koelis®, deformable) approach.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 391 consecutive patients with suspected localized prostate cancer were prospectively included in analysis. All patients underwent prostate magnetic resonance imaging, followed by 10 to 12-core random prostate biopsies. When magnetic resonance imaging detected suspicious findings, targeted biopsy was performed, including visual, rigid system and elastic system targeted biopsies in the first 127 patients, the next 131 and the last 133, respectively. Cancer detection rates were assessed by conditional logistic regression. Targeted biopsies alone and random biopsies were further compared for the amount of tissue sampled and microfocal cancer detection, the latter defined as a single core with 5 mm or less of Gleason 6 cancer.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics and random biopsy detection rates were similar among the groups. Magnetic resonance imaging detected at least 1 suspicious area in 54 (42%), 78 (59%) and 82 patients (62%) in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The cancer detection rates of rigid and elastic system targeted biopsies were significantly higher than the random biopsy rate (p = 0.0065 and 0.0016, respectively). Visual targeted biopsy did not perform better than random biopsy (p = 0.66). Rigid and elastic system targeted biopsies allowed for decreasing the number of cores and the detection of microfocal cancer, while increasing the detection of high grade cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

When performed with computerized magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound image registration, targeted biopsy alone improved cancer detection over random biopsies, decreased the detection rate of microfocal cancer and increased the detection rate of cancer with a Gleason score of greater than 6.

摘要

目的

我们比较了使用刚性(Esaote ® ,不可变形)或弹性(Koelis ® ,可变形)方法的视觉靶向活检与计算机化经直肠超声-磁共振成像配准的准确性。

材料与方法

共前瞻性纳入 391 例疑似局限性前列腺癌患者进行分析。所有患者均接受前列腺磁共振成像检查,随后进行 10 至 12 核随机前列腺活检。当磁共振成像发现可疑发现时,进行靶向活检,包括前 127 例患者的视觉、刚性系统和弹性系统靶向活检,接下来的 131 例和最后 133 例。通过条件逻辑回归评估癌症检出率。进一步比较了靶向活检和随机活检的组织取样量和微灶癌检出率,后者定义为单个核心有 5 毫米或更少的 Gleason 6 癌。

结果

各组患者特征和随机活检检出率相似。磁共振成像在第 1、2 和 3 组中分别检测到至少 1 个可疑区域的患者分别为 54 例(42%)、78 例(59%)和 82 例(62%)。刚性和弹性系统靶向活检的癌症检出率明显高于随机活检率(p = 0.0065 和 0.0016)。视觉靶向活检与随机活检相比效果不佳(p = 0.66)。刚性和弹性系统靶向活检可减少活检芯数并检出微灶癌,同时增加高级别癌症的检出率。

结论

当与计算机化磁共振成像-经直肠超声图像配准联合使用时,靶向活检单独提高了癌症检出率,降低了微灶癌的检出率,增加了 Gleason 评分大于 6 的癌症检出率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验