• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在难治性心源性休克伴左心室收缩不同步的患者中进行临时左心室刺激:一项安全性和可行性研究。

Temporary left ventricular stimulation in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock and asynchronous left ventricular contraction: a safety and feasibility study.

机构信息

Department of Electrophysiology, University of Leipzig - Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2013 Jan;10(1):46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.09.007. Epub 2012 Sep 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.09.007
PMID:22982965
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite modern treatment strategies, cardiogenic shock (CS) is still associated with high mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of temporary percutaneous left ventricular (LV) stimulation as rescue therapy in patients with CS refractory to standard clinical care.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with deteriorating CS without further treatment options received transjugular placement of a temporary LV lead if they exhibited signs of asynchronous LV contraction. To maintain atrioventricular synchronous contraction, an additional right atrial lead was placed in patients with sinus rhythm. The leads were externally connected to a conventional pacemaker. Hemodynamic course, clinical outcome, and adverse events were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 15 patients [ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 8), dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 6), and acute myocarditis (n = 1)] underwent successful lead placement. Median procedure and fluoroscopy times measured 60 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 55-90) and 12 minutes (IQR 7-34), respectively. Ten patients (67%) acutely responded by improvement of hemodynamic parameters with simultaneous reduction of catecholamine support. Catecholamine therapy was discontinued after a median of 28 hours (IQR 16-60). The temporary leads were removed after a median of 6 days (IQR 3-10). Total in-hospital mortality was 47%, measuring 80% in nonresponders and 30% in responders (P = .119). There was no therapy-related serious adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that there may be a role for temporary LV stimulation as rescue therapy in selected patients with refractory CS. In clinical situations where aggressive therapies are used for urgent hemodynamic stabilization, temporary LV stimulation may evolve as a further and less invasive treatment option.

摘要

背景

尽管采用了现代治疗策略,心源性休克(CS)仍然与高死亡率相关。

目的

评估在对标准临床治疗无反应的 CS 患者中,临时经皮左心室(LV)刺激作为抢救治疗的可行性和安全性。

方法

连续出现 CS 恶化且无进一步治疗选择的患者,如果出现 LV 收缩不同步的迹象,将通过经颈静脉放置临时 LV 导联。对于窦性节律的患者,将额外放置右心房导联以保持房室同步收缩。将导联与常规起搏器外部连接。评估血流动力学过程、临床结局和不良事件。

结果

共有 15 名患者[缺血性心肌病(n = 8)、扩张型心肌病(n = 6)和急性心肌炎(n = 1)]成功进行了导联放置。中位手术和透视时间分别为 60 分钟(四分位距 [IQR] 55-90)和 12 分钟(IQR 7-34)。10 名患者(67%)通过改善血流动力学参数和同时减少儿茶酚胺支持而急性应答。儿茶酚胺治疗在中位 28 小时(IQR 16-60)后停止。临时导联在中位 6 天(IQR 3-10)后被移除。总住院死亡率为 47%,无反应者为 80%,反应者为 30%(P =.119)。无治疗相关严重不良事件。

结论

我们的数据表明,在选定的难治性 CS 患者中,临时 LV 刺激可能作为抢救治疗有一定作用。在紧急血流动力学稳定的情况下采用积极治疗的临床情况下,临时 LV 刺激可能会作为进一步的、侵入性较小的治疗选择而出现。

相似文献

1
Temporary left ventricular stimulation in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock and asynchronous left ventricular contraction: a safety and feasibility study.在难治性心源性休克伴左心室收缩不同步的患者中进行临时左心室刺激:一项安全性和可行性研究。
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Jan;10(1):46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.09.007. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
2
The percutaneous ventricular assist device in severe refractory cardiogenic shock.经皮心室辅助装置治疗严重难治性心原性休克。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Feb 8;57(6):688-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.08.613. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
3
Percutaneous left-ventricular support with the Impella-2.5-assist device in acute cardiogenic shock: results of the Impella-EUROSHOCK-registry.经皮左心室辅助Impella-2.5 辅助装置在急性心源性休克中的应用:Impella-EUROSHOCK 注册研究结果。
Circ Heart Fail. 2013 Jan;6(1):23-30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.967224. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
4
Echocardiographic correlates of acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and in-hospital mortality in tako-tsubo cardiomyopathy.超声心动图与急性心力衰竭、心源性休克和心尖球形综合征院内死亡率的相关性。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Feb;7(2):119-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.09.020. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
5
Initial clinical experience with cardiac resynchronization therapy utilizing a magnetic navigation system.使用磁导航系统进行心脏再同步治疗的初步临床经验。
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007 Feb;18(2):174-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2006.00711.x. Epub 2007 Jan 9.
6
Intra-aortic counterpulsation for hemodynamic support in patients with acute ischemic versus non-ischemic heart failure.主动脉内反搏用于急性缺血性与非缺血性心力衰竭患者的血流动力学支持
J Invasive Cardiol. 2012 Nov;24(11):583-8.
7
Use of the percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with severe refractory cardiogenic shock as a bridge to long-term left ventricular assist device implantation.经皮左心室辅助装置在严重难治性心源性休克患者中作为长期左心室辅助装置植入的桥梁的应用。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008 Jan;27(1):106-11. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2007.10.013.
8
Pheochromocytoma-induced atrial tachycardia leading to cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest: resolution with atrioventricular node ablation and pacemaker placement.嗜铬细胞瘤诱发的房性心动过速导致心源性休克和心脏骤停:通过房室结消融和起搏器植入得以解决。
Tex Heart Inst J. 2014 Dec 1;41(6):660-3. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-13-3692. eCollection 2014 Dec.
9
Should patients in cardiogenic shock undergo rescue angioplasty after failed fibrinolysis: comparison of primary versus rescue angioplasty in cardiogenic shock patients.心源性休克患者在溶栓治疗失败后是否应接受补救性血管成形术:心源性休克患者直接血管成形术与补救性血管成形术的比较
J Invasive Cardiol. 2007 May;19(5):217-23.
10
Percutaneous ventricular assist device placement during active cardiopulmonary resuscitation for severe refractory cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后严重难治性心源性休克患者在积极心肺复苏期间经皮置入心室辅助装置
Tex Heart Inst J. 2007;34(2):204-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of cardiogenic shock: a narrative review.心源性休克的管理:一篇叙述性综述。
Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Mar 30;14(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01260-y.
2
Efficacy of Coronary Sinus Pacing for Cardiogenic Shock Due to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-induced Sick Sinus Syndrome: Two Case Reports.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗致病态窦房结综合征引起的心源性休克的冠状窦起搏疗效:两例报告。
Intern Med. 2023 Nov 15;62(22):3355-3360. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1527-22. Epub 2023 Mar 31.
3
Temporary coronary sinus pacing to improve ventricular dyssynchrony with cardiogenic shock: A case report.
临时冠状窦起搏改善心源性休克时的心室不同步:一例报告
World J Clin Cases. 2021 Jul 16;9(20):5562-5567. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i20.5562.
4
Treatment of refractory vasospastic angina complicated by acute pulmonary oedema with levosimendan: a case report.左西孟旦治疗难治性血管痉挛性心绞痛合并急性肺水肿:一例报告
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2019 Feb 5;3(1):ytz002. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytz002. eCollection 2019 Mar.
5
Experts' recommendations for the management of adult patients with cardiogenic shock.专家对心源性休克成年患者管理的建议。
Ann Intensive Care. 2015 Dec;5(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13613-015-0052-1. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
6
Efficacy of cardiac resynchronization in acutely infarcted canine hearts with electromechanical dyssynchrony.心脏再同步化治疗对伴有电机械不同步的急性梗死犬心脏的疗效。
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Oct;11(10):1819-26. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.05.036. Epub 2014 Jun 2.