Department of Electrophysiology, University of Leipzig - Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Jan;10(1):46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.09.007. Epub 2012 Sep 14.
Despite modern treatment strategies, cardiogenic shock (CS) is still associated with high mortality.
To evaluate the feasibility and safety of temporary percutaneous left ventricular (LV) stimulation as rescue therapy in patients with CS refractory to standard clinical care.
Consecutive patients with deteriorating CS without further treatment options received transjugular placement of a temporary LV lead if they exhibited signs of asynchronous LV contraction. To maintain atrioventricular synchronous contraction, an additional right atrial lead was placed in patients with sinus rhythm. The leads were externally connected to a conventional pacemaker. Hemodynamic course, clinical outcome, and adverse events were assessed.
A total of 15 patients [ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 8), dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 6), and acute myocarditis (n = 1)] underwent successful lead placement. Median procedure and fluoroscopy times measured 60 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 55-90) and 12 minutes (IQR 7-34), respectively. Ten patients (67%) acutely responded by improvement of hemodynamic parameters with simultaneous reduction of catecholamine support. Catecholamine therapy was discontinued after a median of 28 hours (IQR 16-60). The temporary leads were removed after a median of 6 days (IQR 3-10). Total in-hospital mortality was 47%, measuring 80% in nonresponders and 30% in responders (P = .119). There was no therapy-related serious adverse event.
Our data indicate that there may be a role for temporary LV stimulation as rescue therapy in selected patients with refractory CS. In clinical situations where aggressive therapies are used for urgent hemodynamic stabilization, temporary LV stimulation may evolve as a further and less invasive treatment option.
尽管采用了现代治疗策略,心源性休克(CS)仍然与高死亡率相关。
评估在对标准临床治疗无反应的 CS 患者中,临时经皮左心室(LV)刺激作为抢救治疗的可行性和安全性。
连续出现 CS 恶化且无进一步治疗选择的患者,如果出现 LV 收缩不同步的迹象,将通过经颈静脉放置临时 LV 导联。对于窦性节律的患者,将额外放置右心房导联以保持房室同步收缩。将导联与常规起搏器外部连接。评估血流动力学过程、临床结局和不良事件。
共有 15 名患者[缺血性心肌病(n = 8)、扩张型心肌病(n = 6)和急性心肌炎(n = 1)]成功进行了导联放置。中位手术和透视时间分别为 60 分钟(四分位距 [IQR] 55-90)和 12 分钟(IQR 7-34)。10 名患者(67%)通过改善血流动力学参数和同时减少儿茶酚胺支持而急性应答。儿茶酚胺治疗在中位 28 小时(IQR 16-60)后停止。临时导联在中位 6 天(IQR 3-10)后被移除。总住院死亡率为 47%,无反应者为 80%,反应者为 30%(P =.119)。无治疗相关严重不良事件。
我们的数据表明,在选定的难治性 CS 患者中,临时 LV 刺激可能作为抢救治疗有一定作用。在紧急血流动力学稳定的情况下采用积极治疗的临床情况下,临时 LV 刺激可能会作为进一步的、侵入性较小的治疗选择而出现。