Pathology & Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Mar;20(3):788-97. doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2659-x. Epub 2012 Sep 15.
Differences in the extent and quality of surgical resection for esophageal cancer may influence the pathological staging and patient outcome. There are no data in the literature qualitatively and/or quantitatively characterizing esophagectomy specimens.
Macroscopic images of 161 esophagectomy specimens were analyzed retrospectively. The extent of resection was qualitatively classified as "muscularis propria," "intra-meso-esophageal," or "meso-esophageal." The volume of meso-esophageal tissue was quantified morphometrically. The number of muscle defects per specimen was counted. Results were related to clinicopathological variables, including survival.
Sixty-two (39%) specimens were classified as "muscularis propria," 65 (40%) as "intra-meso-esophageal," and 34 (21%) as "meso-esophageal." The morphometrically measured meso-esophageal tissue volume was different between the three types (P < 0.001). The specimen type was related to the total number of lymph nodes (P = 0.02), number of metastatic lymph nodes (P = 0.024), and depth of tumor invasion (P = 0.013), but not related to extramural tumor volume, circumferential resection margin status, or the surgeon performing the resection. The number of muscle defects per specimen was similar in all resection types. The resection specimen classification was related to survival in patients treated by surgery alone (P = 0.027).
This is the first study to quantify and classify the volume of tissue resected during esophagectomy. Our study shows significant variation of the resected tissue volume impacting pathological tumor staging. This variation was not associated with individual surgeon performance. A prospective, multicenter study is needed to validate our results and to investigate the potential biological mechanisms influencing the resectable volume of meso-esophageal tissue in cancer patients.
食管癌手术切除范围和质量的差异可能影响病理分期和患者预后。目前文献中尚无定性和/或定量描述食管切除术标本的资料。
回顾性分析 161 例食管切除术标本的大体图像。将切除范围定性分类为“固有肌层”、“食管内”或“食管外”。采用形态计量学方法定量测量食管外组织的体积。计算每个标本的肌缺损数量。结果与临床病理变量相关,包括生存情况。
62 例(39%)标本被归类为“固有肌层”,65 例(40%)为“食管内”,34 例(21%)为“食管外”。三种类型之间形态计量学测量的食管外组织体积存在差异(P < 0.001)。标本类型与淋巴结总数(P = 0.02)、转移淋巴结数(P = 0.024)和肿瘤浸润深度(P = 0.013)相关,但与肿瘤外体积、环周切缘状态或进行切除术的外科医生无关。每个标本的肌缺损数量在所有切除类型中相似。单独手术治疗的患者中,切除标本分类与生存相关(P = 0.027)。
这是第一项定量和分类食管切除术中切除组织体积的研究。我们的研究表明,切除组织体积的显著变化影响病理肿瘤分期。这种变化与个别外科医生的操作无关。需要前瞻性、多中心研究来验证我们的结果,并研究影响癌症患者可切除食管外组织体积的潜在生物学机制。