The dual-use conundrum.
作者信息
Berg Paul
出版信息
Science. 2012 Sep 14;337(6100):1273. doi: 10.1126/science.1229789.
PMID:22984033
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The dual-use conundrum.两用难题。
Science. 2012 Sep 14;337(6100):1273. doi: 10.1126/science.1229789.
2
Public health and biosecurity. Life sciences at a crossroads: respiratory transmissible H5N1.公共卫生与生物安全。处于十字路口的生命科学：呼吸道传播的H5N1。
Science. 2012 Feb 17;335(6070):801-2. doi: 10.1126/science.1218612. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
3
The influenza controversy: should limits be placed on science?流感争议：是否应对科学加以限制？
Hastings Cent Rep. 2012 May-Jun;42(3):12-3. doi: 10.1002/hast.44.
4
Bird-flu research: The biosecurity oversight.禽流感研究：生物安全监督
Nature. 2012 May 23;485(7399):431-4. doi: 10.1038/485431a.
5
Great expectations--ethics, avian flu and the value of progress.厚望——伦理、禽流感和进步的价值。
J Med Ethics. 2013 Apr;39(4):209-13. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100712. Epub 2012 Oct 30.
6
US board says censuring research on avian flu was necessary to prevent a potential catastrophe.美国委员会表示，谴责禽流感研究对于防止潜在灾难是必要的。
BMJ. 2012 Feb 2;344:e840. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e840.
7
The H5N1 moratorium controversy and debate.H5N1暂停令的争议与辩论。
mBio. 2012 Nov 1;3(5):e00379-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00379-12.
8
Public health and biosecurity. H5N1 debates: hung up on the wrong questions.公共卫生与生物安全。H5N1 辩论：纠结于错误的问题。
Science. 2012 Feb 17;335(6070):799-801. doi: 10.1126/science.1219066. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
9
Public health and biosecurity. The obligation to prevent the next dual-use controversy.公共卫生与生物安全。预防下一次两用争议的义务。
Science. 2012 Feb 17;335(6070):802-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1219668. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
10
Dual use research. New U.S. rules increase oversight of H5N1 studies, other risky science.两用研究。美国新规定加强了对H5N1研究及其他高风险科学研究的监管。
Science. 2013 Mar 1;339(6123):1025. doi: 10.1126/science.339.6123.1025.
引用本文的文献
1
Both Epistasis and Diversifying Selection Drive the Structural Evolution of the Ebola Virus Glycoprotein Mucin-Like Domain.上位性和多样化选择共同驱动埃博拉病毒糖蛋白粘蛋白样结构域的结构进化。
J Virol. 2016 May 12;90(11):5475-5484. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00322-16. Print 2016 Jun 1.
Zotero 插件