Anne Mandall Nicky, Cousley Richard, DiBiase Andrew, Dyer Fiona, Littlewood Simon, Mattick Rye, Nute Spencer, Doherty Barbara, Stivaros Nadia, McDowall Ross, Shargill Inderjit, Ahmad Amreen, Walsh Tanya, Worthington Helen
N. A. Mandall, Tameside General Hospital, Ashton-u-Lyne, Lancashire, UK.
J Orthod. 2012 Sep;39(3):176-85. doi: 10.1179/1465312512Z.00000000028.
To investigate the effectiveness of early class III protraction facemask treatment in children under 10 years of age at 3-year follow-up.
Multicentre randomized controlled trial.
Seventy-three patients were randomly allocated, stratified for gender, into early class III protraction facemask group (PFG) (n = 35) and a control/no treatment group (CG) (n = 38).
Dentofacial changes were assessed from lateral cephalograms and occlusal changes using the peer assessment rating (PAR). Self-esteem was assessed using the Piers-Harris children's self-concept scale, and the psychosocial impact of malocclusion with oral aesthetic subjective impact score (OASIS) questionnaire. Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) signs and symptoms were also recorded. The time points for data collection were at registration (DC1), 15 months later (DC2) and 3 years post-registration (DC3).
The following mean skeletal and occlusal changes occurred from the class III starting point to DC3 (3-year follow-up): SNA, PFG moved forwards +2·3° (CG forward +1·6°; P = 0·14); SNB, PFG moved forwards +0·8° (CG forward +1·5°, P = 0·26); ANB, PFG class III base improved +1·5° (CG stayed about the same at +0·1°; P = 0·001). This contributed to an overall difference in ANB between PFG and CG of +1·4° in favour of early protraction facemask treatment. The overjet was still improved by +3·6 mm in the PFG and changed a small amount +1·1 mm in the CG (P = 0·001). A 21% improvement in PAR was shown in the PFG and the CG worsened by 8·4% (P = 0·02). There was no increase in self-esteem (Piers-Harris score) for PFG compared with the CG (P = 0·56) and no statistically significant difference in the impact of malocclusion (OASIS) between groups in terms of the changes from DC1 to DC3 (P = 0·18). TMJ signs and symptoms were very low at DC1 and DC3.
The favourable effect of early class III protraction facemask treatment undertaken in patients under 10 years of age, is maintained at 3-year follow-up in terms of ANB, overjet and % PAR improvement. The direct protraction treatment effect at SNA is still favourable although not statistically significantly better than the CG. Seventy per cent of patients in PFG had maintained a positive overjet which we have defined as ongoing treatment success. Early protraction facemask treatment does not seem to influence self-esteem or reduce the patient's personal impact of their malocclusion at 3-year follow-up.
在3年随访期内,研究早期Ⅲ类前牵引面罩治疗对10岁以下儿童的疗效。
多中心随机对照试验。
73例患者按性别分层,随机分为早期Ⅲ类前牵引面罩组(PFG)(n = 35)和对照组/未治疗组(CG)(n = 38)。
通过头颅侧位片评估牙颌面变化,采用同侪评估评分(PAR)评估咬合变化。使用皮尔斯 - 哈里斯儿童自我概念量表评估自尊,通过口腔美学主观影响评分(OASIS)问卷评估错牙合的心理社会影响。还记录颞下颌关节(TMJ)的体征和症状。数据收集时间点为登记时(DC1)、15个月后(DC2)和登记后3年(DC3)。
从Ⅲ类起始点到DC3(3年随访),出现以下平均骨骼和咬合变化:SNA,PFG向前移动 +2.3°(CG向前移动 +1.6°;P = 0.14);SNB,PFG向前移动 +0.8°(CG向前移动 +1.5°,P = 0.26);ANB,PFGⅢ类基底改善 +1.5°(CG保持不变,为 +0.1°;P = 0.001)。这导致PFG和CG之间ANB的总体差异为 +1.4°,有利于早期前牵引面罩治疗。PFG的覆盖仍改善了 +3.6 mm,CG仅少量改变了 +1.1 mm(P = 0.001)。PFG的PAR改善了21%,CG恶化了8.4%(P = 0.02)。与CG相比,PFG的自尊(皮尔斯 - 哈里斯评分)没有增加(P = 0.56),并且在从DC1到DC3的变化方面,两组之间错牙合的影响(OASIS)没有统计学上的显著差异(P = 0.18)。DC1和DC3时TMJ的体征和症状非常少。
对于10岁以下患者进行的早期Ⅲ类前牵引面罩治疗,在ANB、覆盖和PAR改善百分比方面,3年随访时仍保持良好效果。SNA处的直接前牵引治疗效果仍然良好,尽管在统计学上不比CG组显著更好。PFG组70%的患者保持了正向覆盖,我们将其定义为持续治疗成功。早期前牵引面罩治疗在3年随访时似乎不影响自尊,也未减轻患者错牙合对个人的影响。